Laserfiche WebLink
• The proposed budget would increase the City's tax capacity rate from 35.920% in 2000 <br />to 36.482% in 2001. Rolek observed that except for 1999 when tax rate compression <br />skewed the numbers, the City's tax capacity rate has been fairly level. The proposed <br />increase for 2001 would increase the City's share of residential property taxes $6.49 per <br />year for a house valued at $100,000; $11.12 per year for a house valued at $150,000; and <br />$20.39 per year for a house valued at $250,000. <br />Rolek briefly reviewed the capital items that would be purchased through Certificates of <br />Indebtedness or internal, interest incurring loans from the Area and Unit Fund. He <br />explained the impact the three-year repayment schedule will have on future budgets. He <br />then referred to the list of capital requests that had been eliminated by staff while <br />finalizing the draft budget. He explained the importance of establishing a revolving fund <br />for equipment replacement. Such a fund would save approximately $42,000 in interest <br />on 2001 certificates of indebtedness. The proposed budget does not include money to <br />establish a revolving fund. <br />• <br />• <br />Rolek then moved on to an explanation of anticipated revenues for 2001. Property taxes <br />account for 64% of revenues. He reviewed the revenue sources by category and noted <br />the estimates are based on historical experience. He explained that the proposed budget <br />includes funding drawn from reserves, leaving reserves at a level just above 50% of <br />expected General Fund expenditures. He noted this is a healthy level of reserves but if <br />the City continues to use reserves for operating expenditures, the level could be impacted <br />negatively. <br />He then provided a brief overview of proposed expenditures and referred to a list of <br />adjustments made to revenue and expenditure requests in fmalizing the draft budget. <br />Community Development Department <br />Community Development Director Brian Wessel presented the proposed budget for <br />divisions in his department. A new cost center containing the Community Development <br />Director and Community Development Secretary has been created by moving those <br />positions out of Economic Development. <br />Wessel reviewed the proposed Economic Development budget and noted that it assumes <br />that until he retires in September 2001, he will be the temporary Economic Development <br />Director and a new Community Development Director will assume responsibility for the <br />Community Development Department. <br />Wessel then reviewed the proposed budget for the Planning & Zoning Division. He <br />explained that $20,000 for planning consultants to assist with new zoning ordinances was <br />not spent in 2000 and will be carried over to 2001. <br />City Engineer John Powell explained the proposed 2001 contract with his firm, TKDA, <br />does not include a cost increase for 2001. The firm is committed to keeping Powell in the <br />City even though he has been promoted to a department head position in the firm He has <br />