Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 26, 2001 <br />Water <br />The City's water rates are based on a quarterly charge per REU and a charge on water usage. The <br />usage charge is based on 1,000 gallon units. <br />The major expenses related to water charges include the cost of operating the system, bond expenses, <br />and depreciation. The bond expenses would be offset by a transfer from the Area and Unit Fund. <br />The water rate computation also assumes a 220 unit increase in the number of connections on an <br />annual basis. In order to satisfy the Department of Natural Resources concerns regarding water <br />appropriation (pumping) the proposed rate structure increases the rate per gallon for heavier water <br />use. This also keeps the base rate for the lower water users very close to the existing level. <br />The current water rate is $10.00 per quarter per REU and $1.63 per 1,000 gallons. The proposed <br />water rate increase is as follows: <br />Effective March 26, 2001 through December 31, 2003: <br />Water Usage Rates: <br />$1.77 per 1,000 gallons <br />$2.07 per 1,000 gallons <br />Water User Fee: <br />0 to 30,000 gallons <br />all water use abov <br />$10.00 • er <br />The average household uses approxi ons of water per quarter. Based on this <br />information, the average increase e s fo sanitary sewer and water per quarter will be from <br />$109.90 in 2000 to $123.10 i <br />Mayor Bergeson inqu <br />Council. Finance Dire <br />Met Council will recei <br />ow the expenses for sanitary sewer break out for the Metropolitan <br />dvised the budget in 2001 is just over one million dollars. The <br />ximately $467,000, which is about 45%. <br />Council Member Reinert asked if the dollars that go to the Metropolitan Council are based on a <br />percentage. Finance Director Rolek advised the fee is based on the amount of water the Met Council <br />treats directly from the City of Lino Lakes. The water is measured and the City does get billed for <br />that amount. <br />Council Member Dahl asked what the Metropolitan Council was charging in the past and what the <br />City was paying. She asked if that is why the City has a deficit for the utility. Finance Director Rolek <br />stated the City has had a deficit in the past because the City is not charging enough to cover the costs <br />of the system. The major expense related to that is the depreciation that includes the replacement <br />costs of the system. The City has not been generating enough revenue to cover that expense. The <br />proposed rates will cover the costs of replacing the system. <br />3 <br />