Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 29, 2001 <br />Council Member Carlson moved to make an offer of employment to Mr. Patrick Moonen, conditional <br />upon successful completion of a background check. Council Member Reinert seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA <br />There was no Public Safety Department Report. <br />PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER <br />There was no Public Services Department report. <br />COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT <br />Resolution No. 01— 71, Approve Lino Lakes Marketplace EAW f i istribution, (3/5 Vote <br />Required), John Powell — City Engineer Powell advised the Min ota s statues require <br />environmental review for certain projects. Rules written by the nvironmental Quality <br />Board (EQB) describe the requirements for the environment `ev w �� se rules were written to <br />implement MN Statute 116D, the Minnesota Environmen <br />City staff has reviewed the information submitted by <br />Marketplace project. This project includes a Tar <br />of smaller retail buildings. Staff has amended <br />the EAW be distributed for public comme <br />Environmental Review Process <br />The rules state that when speci <br />mandatory environmental re <br />worksheet (EAW). An E W is <br />facts necessary to determi <br />EAW form was created by <br />project specifics. <br />ct proposer on the Lino Lakes <br />erstor , Kohls, and approximately 35,000 sf <br />ation and is comfortable recommending that <br />of projects reach a specified size, they cross a threshold for <br />twit mental review starts with an environmental assessment <br />d as a brief document, which is designed to set out the basic <br />an environmental impact statement (EIS) is necessary. The <br />It is a list of questions that must be completed based on the <br />E4B. <br />Briefly, the project proposer submits information for the EAW. The City then reviews the submitted <br />information for accuracy and completeness. Then the EAW is distributed and made available for <br />public review. A public comment period of 30 days follows. <br />Approving the EAW for distribution means that the City is comfortable that the document is accurate <br />and complete to the best of its knowledge. There is no other commitment or hidden implication <br />regarding the approval of the project in making the decision to distribute the document. Approving <br />the EAW for distribution does not mean that the City is approving the project. On the contrary, if a <br />project requires an EAW, the project cannot be started and no governmental entity can make a final <br />decision on the project until the environmental review process is completed. <br />