My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/10/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
09/10/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:28:24 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 3:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 <br />Mr. Wayne Hanson, 839 Oak Lane, stated he is against giving the development any money. He stated <br />you just don't give away prime property to the first developer that comes along. The traffic light, <br />Apollo Lane extension and 77th Street are concerns and it does not seem like there is a good plan. He <br />asked what will happen to the businesses along Lake Drive. It seems as though the City has lost is <br />sense of where it is going. He indicated he wanted the City to be different from other cities and Lino <br />Lakes needs to be more creative. <br />Ms. Andrea Davis, 850 Lois Lane, stated she is against any amount of abatement. Development will <br />come and the City does not need to pay for it. <br />Mr. Mike Trehus, 675 Shadow Court, stated if the subsidy were only one dollar it would be too much. <br />Development will come. This project will cause traffic, accidents, and there are too many costs. The <br />City will be losing wetland and upland, as well as park space. He asked why the City should pay for <br />the project. The project will take away tax dollars from the residents and it is not fair. The Council <br />needs to protect the City and say "no" to tax abatement. <br />Mr. Michael Stanton, 1157 Main Street, stated giving Target mon n+ ` . g•"• idea. The City <br />needs to be very cautious and look what happened in other co i , es a Target was <br />developed. <br />Ms. Myra Spijer, 839 Oak Lane, stated the future <br />needs to be careful about development. People <br />to go shopping. Residents can still go to <br />be a minimum number of jobs created <br />effect on the residents is a huge c <br />but is very concerned about p • . ues. e <br />is a bedroom community and the City <br />his City knowing they would have to travel <br />t to shop without this project. There will <br />ve a very small impact. The tax abatement and <br />d she is not sure she understands the whole project, <br />added she is against the project. <br />Ms. Renee Curwick, 3 O • e, s ated she has many concerns about the project. She asked how it <br />will benefit the comm >_et only gives back 1%, and that is only if you use a credit card. <br />Target can help the co ' u by paying a livable wage. Target wants this location because they <br />know they can make a project. Where will the tax breaks stop? A huge retailer gets a break, but not <br />the small business owners. She stated she is very embarrassed that the City would make such a deal. <br />Give the money to schools. The problems caused would include increases in City services, traffic, <br />inconveniences of rerouting traffic, noise and crime. She stated she hopes the City will not give to the <br />rich and tax everyone else. <br />Mr. James Kauth, 849 W 77th Street, came forward and inquired about the latest plan for 77th Street. <br />Mayor Bergeson advised staff will address questions after the public hearing. <br />Mr. Milo Anderson, 7102 Sunrise Drive, stated he cannot believe a large corporation expects the City <br />to pay them to build. He indicated it is very disturbing. He also thanked the residents present who <br />provided information. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.