My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/10/2001 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2001
>
09/10/2001 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:28:24 PM
Creation date
2/4/2015 3:51:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/10/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 <br />A resident at 7784 Carole Drive stated there are a lot of kids on Carole Drive and safety is an issue. <br />Traffic is also a problem and it needs to be eliminated, not added to. She read an ad from a St. Paul <br />paper that advertised for jobs at the new Lino Lakes Target store. <br />A resident at 3773 Red Clover Lane stated the project is a bad thing for Lino Lakes. There is a <br />development going in right down the road and the City should wait and see what happens with that. <br />Mr. Jim Sargent came forward and stated he works for Target and has been a resident for 18 years. <br />He is disappointed in Target but it is a good company. He stated the City should not give in to <br />abatements or subsidies. He indicated he does not want Target in Lino Lakes because he likes it quiet <br />and just the way it is. <br />Ms. Kelly Gunderson, 135 Ulmer Drive, thanked Council Members Dahl and Carlson for withholding <br />their vote while there are still questions. She thanked residents for all their information and Council <br />Member O'Donnell. She stated the Council has a very tough decision with many issues. Jobs are <br />needed in the area as well as a larger tax base. The abatement request is to•_ uch for the City. <br />Property taxes will go up and the City does not necessarily need a Tart are many Targets <br />close by. She questioned the success of the Target with a Wal Maq c' .e b She asked the <br />Council to talk to other developers for another deal. She also . ; e ' a • : ' to listen to the <br />citizens. The abatement should be denied and then let Tarte ec t > y want to stay. <br />Mr. Mel Liljedahl, 726 Vicky Lane, stated he is alai a a ment. He is fine with the Target but <br />they should pay their own way. He stated he gua . tee arget will be here in two (2) years asking <br />for subsidized housing due to low wages. <br />Mr. Tom Smith, 874 Oak Lane, c <br />any out-of-pocket dollar costs <br />the abatement dollars ever <br />stated he is not agains he in <br />against the abatement <br />infrastructure. <br />asked how tax abatement works and if there are <br />stated Target will pay taxes after five (5) years, but will <br />There will be an additional charge for infrastructure. He <br />re costs because the road has to be improved. He added he is <br />the figures have come down. He indicated he would rather pay for <br />A resident at 514 Linda Lane stated there is a lot of support for this project but not everyone can be at <br />every meeting. She stated she trusts the Council will see what it means to the City. Target would be <br />fabulous tenants and she hopes it is approved. <br />Ms. Chris Mayer, 6351Red Hawk Trail, stated there are a lot of people who want this project. The <br />City need progress and the issues should be worked out. <br />Mr. Don Dunn, 6885 Black Duck Drive, stated he does respect all the opinions that were expressed <br />this evening even if he does not agree with them. He stated he has a different vision for Lino Lakes — <br />the integration of commercial and residential development to help the City move forward. He stated <br />he does have empathy for those residents who live across the street from the project and he believes <br />traffic can be improved. Lake Drive is a commercial site on the current plan. Commercial property <br />needs to be developed. He stated the Council should have the common sense to say yes to this <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.