Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 10, 2001 <br />because it is right. He indicated he understands the needs of businesses for abatement and believes <br />the same argument would be made five (5) years from now about any development from the same <br />people. The City needs businesses and the YMCA. He added he is very happy that the rezone was <br />approved and glad that Council Member Dahl and Carlson had agreed to reconsider. Target does not <br />need the City for their future but the City needs them for its future. All citizens in the Forest Lake <br />School District will benefit immediately. The County will get their money right away and that will <br />also benefit the City, similar to the County Park. He stated he believes Lino Lakes has become a <br />better community in the last 13 years and this is another step in the right direction. The City has a <br />great opportunity right now and the Comprehensive Plan support this and calls for a structure to lower <br />the tax rate. That will only happen with commercial development. He indicated he believes the <br />majority of residents are in favor of this understanding that there are some dollars to be paid for it. <br />The City absolutely needs this now. He asked the Council to approve the abatement and move <br />forward. The project is in conformance with the City survey and new Comprehensive Plan. He stated <br />he sees this as part of the overall approach to make Lino Lakes better. He asked the Council to make <br />this happen as soon as possible. <br />Ms. Ina Liljedahl, 726 Vicky Lane, came forward and read comments ade at a church <br />service relating to large businesses and money compared to hum .'s' e asked how many <br />people present knew that Target was already advertising for jo o She stated that by <br />advertising already, the public hearing is a waste of timems's not listening. She stated <br />she is angry that the Council says they represent the res' lout m ple people present are against <br />the project. She asked the Council to think very c m p be `a e a multi billion -dollar company is <br />asking for everything they can. She stated it is s efu : at the Council is even considering this and <br />the Council should use their power tom. +' b vot Commercial development is not the issue. <br />The City should make them pay their o ' a he sed the Council to not vote yes to abatement. <br />Target thinks this is already a don e. �. ` on them for that. The Council should vote no and <br />see what Target does. She as = e Co cil please not make this a waste of time. <br />Ms. Nancy (?), 873 O . Lane, e f:rward and gave facts about Target's profits, revenues, sales and <br />financial statements. , .tee e can not believe Target is asking the City for an abatement. She <br />asked why the compan . a "the City for a tax break. An abatement is corporate welfare and the <br />City should not particip. -. Residents present are adamantly opposed to the project. She stated there <br />are very few residents present who are in favor of the project. If the project is completed, there will <br />be three Target's closer than the high school. This development is not within the scope of the 20/20 <br />Vision. Traffic and safety are also issue. She stated this is the third time she has spoke in opposition <br />to this issue. She asked the Council to please vote no. <br />Mr. Jeff Rutz, 6996 Second Avenue, stated he has several facts. Anoka County, the school district <br />and the City of Blaine told Target no. Target wants this land and they will pay for it because it is the <br />last exit not developed. This is Target's last chance because there will be significant changes to tax <br />abatement. He read an article from the June Star Tribune regarding the proposed abatement changes. <br />Target is asking to take money away from the children of Lino Lakes and the Council should not <br />allow that. He stated he is very disappointed about the ad in the paper for employment and the fact <br />that the YMCA representative is in favor of the project. The 90% growth rate over the last 10 years <br />should be enough for the YMCA. He stated the project should not be allowed on the taxpayers dollar. <br />