Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES <br />DECEMBER 17, 2001 <br />Cuoncilmember O'Donnell stated he did not second the motion because this evening's action was <br />only the first of two readings on the proposed ordinance. He felt the City Council could direct staff to <br />gather more information regarding the process prior to the second reading. Then, if the Council feels <br />the process information is not sufficient at that time, the interim ordinance could be denied and started <br />over. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he would not want to have to start over with this issue. He noted if the <br />City Council approved the first reading this evening and the second reading fails, more time will be <br />lost. He noted Councilmember Carlson had expressed concern for the urgency in establishing the <br />ordinances in a timely manner. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he did not wish to be in a position of t <br />however, he had been fairly disappointed by the limited amount of i <br />meeting. Additionally, he noted that all the issues he has brought up <br />up by him in the past during Council discussions on this topic. <br />e interim ordinance, <br />efore tonight's <br />g have been brought <br />Councilmember Carlson did not support tabling the interi <br />interim ordinance referring to a moratorium had been disc <br />Committee and was discussed by the City's Planning onsu <br />comprehensive plan. <br />Councilmember Calrson stated the Environmen <br />interim ordinance for a moratorium. She be <br />the moratorium carefully and she is very s ; ort <br />deal of effort, hard work and improvement <br />Councilmember Carlson believed <br />entire process for four weeks and she <br />this evening. <br />s evening. She noted that an <br />&Comprehensive Plan <br />when the Council approved the <br />d in June unanimously recommended an <br />f has considered all the ramifications of <br />ivf`"tiff's work. She stated she has seen a great <br />City's Planning Department. <br />e interim ordinance this evening would delay the <br />ouncil should approve the first reading as presented <br />Community Development Di •r Grp ala believed that there would be an option, if the City <br />Council feels the irtt n pro ": during the second reading was not sufficient, to table the <br />second reading to theeting. <br />Community Developme I rector Grochala stated that the 143 issues reflected his reviewing the <br />comprehensive plan and i tifying policy statements within the plan that focused on zoning and <br />subdividison ordinance issues. He indicated that most of the 143 policy statements will not require <br />separate ordinances to address, however, they provide City staff with a reference to create policies to <br />implement the goals of the comprehensive plan. He stated that the 143 policy statements he <br />mentioned to the Council are condensed into a list included in the implementation section of the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated City staff has been attempting to put together <br />ideas and a process on how to proceed with the implementation of the comprehensive plan. He stated <br />staff intended to come back before the City Council at their January 14, 2002 meeting with a <br />14 <br />