My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/11/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
03/11/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:21:38 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 10:07:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/11/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 11, 2002 <br />this helped to substantiate a very strong possible link between the eagles and the abandonment of the <br />Peltier Lake rookery for the past two years. <br />Mr. Lindner stated there are already laws in place to protect aquatic plants. He indicated page 12 of <br />the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Guide to Aquatic Plans states it is not permitted to <br />remove aquatic plants from an undeveloped shoreline. Additionally, he noted other laws already exist <br />to protect individuals and shorelines. Per the Minnesota Boating Guide, "It is against the law to <br />operate a watercraft so its wash or wake endangers, harasses, or interferes with any person or <br />property." <br />Mr. Lindner indicated he has learned a tremendous amount about individuals, organizations, <br />government, wildlife and aquatic plans in the last several years. He reiterated that he and Mr. <br />LeBlanc shook hands during the Peltier Lake Association meeting on March 4th and agreed to put the <br />past behind them. He felt it was clear that the majority of the 1 eshore owners do not want <br />restrictions and noted the herons and egrets have flourished fro X489 until 2000 without restrictions:- <br />' <br />Additionally, aquatic vegetation has established itself with the ``, ®oating activity, also without <br />restrictions. <br />Mr. Lindner noted he has agreed to a compromise by mo4p kiing to the main part of the lake, <br />south of the island. He indicated the Saint Paul Water' tilty has agreed to assist the Peltier Lake <br />Association in the installation of as many bog poles as ne ary. <br />Mr. Lindner stated eagles, based on several inde <br />herons. He indicated there is not one, but tw <br />Lake heron rookery. The nest on Peltier I <br />centrally located because of the pond. T <br />same pattern as the Coquitlam Rooke <br />Mr. Lindner indicated data s <br />and four percent in Anoka Co <br />personal property and people. <br />simply need to be enforced. <br />studies of numerous rookeries, prey on <br />d eagle nests within close proximity to the Peltier <br />the same location where the rookery used to be <br />rookery on Peltier Island appears to be following the <br />as completely abandoned. <br />on lake use are low statistically, four percent Statewide <br />laws are already in place to protect aquatic vegetation, <br />did not believe duplicate laws are needed, rather the original laws <br />Mr. Lindner asked the City Council to not adopt the proposed ordinance since there is no evidence <br />that herons are leaving because of skiing activity and because the current regulations protect aquatic <br />plants, individuals and shoreline property. He noted signs have been added within the last two weeks <br />to the island for no trespassing from April 1 to July 15. He asked that the Peltier Lake Association be <br />allowed to work with the Ecology Services and the Division of Fisheries at the Department of Natural <br />Resources, the Rice Creek Watershed District and the Anoka County Parks Department to help <br />improve the lake's ecosystem. <br />Amy Donlin stated she serves on the Environmental Board but was present this evening representing <br />herself. She did not feel the Peltier Lake island could be protected enough and she would prefer the <br />adoption of Anoka County's no -wake zone Alternative No. 1. She felt lucky to have eagles in the <br />area and she wished she could trust people to care for the natural resources. She noted the Anoka <br />12 <br />• <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.