Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 11, 2002 <br />County Parks and Recreation Department had identified plants, birds and wildlife in this area that <br />need to be protected. She has observed water skiers on Goose Lake in White Bear Lake who set up <br />their activities with no regard to the water foul. She has witnessed a bare -foot water skier plow right <br />into a group of loons. She did not feel the City should simply expect people to proceed with common <br />sense. <br />Ron Marier stated his property would be located within the proposed no -wake zone. He stated he has <br />witnessed blue herons and eagles coexisting for more than 40 years. He noted a statement had been <br />made that the majority of the Peltier Lake Association members do not want restrictions on the lake, <br />however, he believed the majority of the Association members were looking for some sort of <br />restrictions to protect the natural resources. <br />Mr. Marier noted for years the north end of the island had been protected and there had almost never <br />been human encroachment during the heron's sensitive nestin:. time. However, since the 1990's there <br />has been a great deal of impact to the fragile environment of n. nd of the island through water <br />skiing and other boating activity. <br />Mr. Marier noted the Peltier Lake Association had recomm ® ed two options to address this issue, <br />the use of bog poles to delineate a no -wake zone to the no e island and a no -wake zone <br />beginning south of the island similar to those reco dire by Anoka County. He did not want to <br />risk more years of failed heron reproduction and he . opo that the no -wake zone begin at least 400 <br />feet from the south end of the island. He did not . •ple understood what is at stake and that if <br />this resource is lost, it will be taken away from 1 d • s ts, not just the lakeshore property owners. <br />He indicated there had been a great deal of in ation presented in an attempt to explain the <br />abandonment of the heron rookery and he e e number one reason was human disturbance. <br />He asked that the City Council adopt the • • o d ordinance, including one of the no -wake zone <br />alternatives recommended by Anoka <br />Wayne LeBlanc, 1677 Peltie <br />algae bloom in the southern p <br />portion of the lake has no aquat <br />indicated the aquatic plants in th <br />resented a photo of Peltier Lake and noted the amount of <br />e. He stated this was due to the fact that the southern <br />ts. He noted the clarity of the north end of the lake and <br />ea act as filters. <br />Mr. LeBlanc presented the City Council with a letter from Charles Johnson, Rice Creek Watershed <br />District Aquatic Biologist, which discussed the water quality of the northern and southern halves of <br />Peltier Lake and the need to protect the area north of the island. He felt the no -wake zone should <br />extend to the south of the island in order to protect the entire area. <br />Mr. LeBlanc presented an aerial image of the north end of Peltier Lake, which depicted the damage to <br />aquatic plants caused by the water skiing course. He indicated a large number of plants have been <br />removed from this area, which he felt was a tragedy. Additionally, he noted the heavy skiing in this <br />area also places the sediment in suspension and causes numerous problems, such as phosphorus loads <br />into the water column, and he noted the lake flows north to south. He felt the ecology of the lake is <br />similar to a rain forest and noted 10 to 20 percent of the area has been destroyed by the water skiing <br />course. He felt the lake needed to be protected now in the hopes that the damaged area will recover. <br />13 <br />