Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 11, 2002 <br />Community Development Director Grochala noted the Joint Powers Agreement should be acted on <br />prior to the ordinance since two separate jurisdictions are involved. <br />Mayor Bergeson questioned whether the Joint Powers Agreement spelled out the action of the <br />ordinance. Community Development Director Grochala stated the verbiage in Section III.A.2 of the <br />ordinance had been modified so as to generalize the location of the slow no -wake zone. He indicated <br />once the ordinance is approved, including the specific location for the no -wake zone, then the Joint <br />Powers Agreement would be finalized and the legal description of the no -wake zone boundaries <br />included. <br />Councilmember Reinert felt approving the Joint Powers Agreement prior to the ordinance would be <br />out of order. He noted if the City Council did not take action this evening to approve the ordinance, <br />then there would be an approved Joint Powers Agreement with no ordinance. He questioned whether <br />approving the Joint Powers Agreement committed the Council to adopting the ordinance. <br />It was City Attorney Hawkins' opinion that the most important <br />boundary would be drawn. He felt it would be acceptable to <br />Powers Agreement. <br />s where the no -wake zone <br />e ordinance prior to the Joint <br />Councilmember Carlson questioned when the birds w ` ected to return and noted comments had <br />been made that the timing is important. Ms. Gallie ec ''- e great blue herons to begin returning to <br />the rookery in the middle of March. She noted al ds would not return at the exact same time. <br />Councilmember Carlson requested confirmati <br />evening, the second reading would be con <br />then be published and would take effect <br />Grochala stated this is correct. <br />hat if the first reading of the ordinance is passed this <br />two weeks and, if approved, the ordinance would <br />after publication. Community Development Director <br />Mr. Lindner wished to ensure a twoosals put forth by the Peltier Lake Association were also <br />being considered. <br />Mayor Bergeson acknowledged tPeltier Lake Association had suggested the no -wake zone begin <br />either at the existing bog poles, or approximately 100 feet south of the island. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell stated both the aquatic life and the rookery are precious resources and to <br />ignore these resources would be irresponsible. He questioned whether there was any way to <br />accomplish this goal without an ordinance. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the only way to protect the resources without an <br />ordinance would be to expect the users of the lake to simply agree to adhere to a no -wake zone. <br />However, this would not address those lake users who are not aware of the situation. He felt buoys <br />should be used to delineate the no -wake zone so that non-resident users of the lake are aware of the <br />zone. Additionally, he indicated an ordinance would allow the City the ability to enforce the no -wake <br />zone and City staff felt this would legally be the best way to address the situation. <br />21 <br />