Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 11, 2002 <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson reported on January 23, 2002, a task force of stakeholders met to <br />discuss the problem. The group identified a number of possible reasons that may have lead to the <br />disappearance of the birds. Several strategies were formulated to protect both the bird colonies on <br />Peltier Island, as well as the unique vegetative and aquatic features on the north side of the island. <br />The creation of a no -wake zone area around the north side of the island was suggested and <br />unanimously supported by the task force. <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson indicated the purpose of the no -wake zoned is to minimize human <br />disturbance to adjacent nesting birds, aquatic vegetation, and water quality around the island. The <br />need for buffer areas around nesting birds is well documented. Research indicates the need for at <br />least a 300 -meter nesting and buffer zone for great blue heron nests, and that the birds tend to <br />abandon nests when larger disturbances occur within 500 meters. The effects of intensive motorized <br />watercraft use in shallow lake areas is also well documented. <br />Environmental Specialist.Asleson advised the proposed ordinan <br />lying north of the southern section lines of Sections 10 and 11, <br />at the southern boundary of Rehbeins Peltier View Subdivisi <br />proposed, is generally consistent with a 500 -meter buffer <br />wake zone would be in effect 24 hours per day all year. <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson stated regulating <br />governments. Regulation is achieved through loci <br />governments involved in the issue of regulatin <br />Centerville. As part of the ordinance adoptio <br />Agreement. The Joint Powers Agreement <br />enforce the ordinance requirements. <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson i <br />notification of this area on ake. <br />Natural Resources Conservati <br />letter of support for adoption o e <br />for Council review. <br />would establish a no -wake zone <br />p 31N, Range 22W, starting <br />Lakes. The defined area, as <br />e bird nesting habitat. The no - <br />lakes in Minnesota is delegated to local <br />ance establishment. There are two local <br />eltier Lake, the Cities of Lino Lakes and <br />ocess, the two cities will need to pass a Joint Powers <br />ement between the two cities to jointly adopt and <br />a County would be responsible for posting and <br />oka County Sheriffs Department and the Department of <br />d be responsible for the enforcement of this ordinance. A <br />o dinance from Anoka County was included in the agenda packet <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson noted the Peltier Lake Association met on March 4, 2002 to discuss <br />this issue. City staff understands that the Association is proposing a modification to the proposed no - <br />wake zone that would be acceptable to Association members. Staff would welcome any <br />modifications that alleviate Association member concerns while still addressing the stated <br />environmental concerns. <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson stated during a recent Council work session, the Council had asked <br />that Anoka County submit a letter to the City depicting their preference for a no -wake zone. He <br />presented a map showing two alternatives proposed by Anoka County for a no -wake zone south of the <br />Lake Peltier island. He indicated Anoka County would prefer adoption of no -wake zone Alternative <br />No. 1. <br />