My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
03/20/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
03/20/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:20:43 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 10:15:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
03/20/2002
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION MARCH 20, 2002 <br />Chief Pecchia stated everyone on the lake is aware of the public meetings. He stated he <br />did advise the residents that they need to bring their concerns forward to the Council. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated there were two members of the Council that were not in <br />favor of a sunset clause. She stated she wanted to put in a condition of approval that the <br />ordinance be reviewed periodically. She stated she is concerned about a sunset clause <br />because the City has not put a sunset clause into any other City ordinances. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated the sunset provision and the exact alignment of the no -wake zone <br />would be discussed further at the meeting on Monday. <br />Ms. Capra noted the City of Centerville did approve the 200 foot buffer with the no -wake <br />zone at an angle. <br />Environmental Specialist Asleson advised that Ms. Joan Gal <br />Natural Resources (DNR) had indicated the DNR would <br />area. <br />epartment of <br />2,500 foot swimming <br />Community Development Director Grochala state ery important that the issue not <br />be dropped once the ordinance is passed. This ' .4 a wi eed continual evaluation. <br />Another option is to put in a clause that states - • unity Development Director <br />must provide an evaluation every two year • •'wake zone, rookery and other <br />environmental aspects of the island. The r cil can then make a decision about <br />whether or not to keep the ordinance. c lso work with the DNR and Anoka <br />County Parks for updates. <br />Environmental Specialists Asle R" - d - problem is how to determine what number <br />of birds coming back is a sign c: ber. <br />Councilmember Reinert s a+ sun et clause will not make the no -wake zone go <br />away. It will just keep the 1 ue on the table and help identify the problem of why the <br />birds left. He stated he is no support of extending the sunset clause past two years. <br />This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, March 25, 2002, 6:30 p.m. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET (EAW), PHEASANT HILLS <br />12TH ADDITION, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated the City received a petition requesting <br />the preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Pheasant <br />Hills 12th Addition project. The petition requests that the Minnesota Environmental <br />Quality Board (EQB) act as the responsible governmental unit for the EAW. In <br />accordance with the rules, the EQB decides which governmental unit has the greatest <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.