Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 25, 2002 <br />Community Development Director Grochala indicated the intent would be for City staff to continue <br />working with Anoka County and the Department of Natural Resources to evaluate all the <br />environmental components of the Peltier Lake island and surrounding areas. He indicated the primary <br />concern regarding the inclusion of a sunset date was to ensure if the ordinance is adopted the results <br />of this action will be followed and reported. <br />Mayor Bergeson reopened the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. and invited Mary Capra, Centerville City <br />Councilmember, to speak first. <br />Ms. Capra wished to express her individual concern regarding the sunset date included in the <br />ordinance. She indicated because Centerville is a statutory City, it cannot place a sunset clause in its <br />ordinances. However, because Lino Lakes is a charter City, they can include a time limit and she felt <br />this would result in Lino Lakes holding the ordinance adopted by Centerville in their hands. She <br />indicated the City of Centerville concurred with a two to three . review of the situation but asked <br />that the Lino Lakes City Council reconsider the inclusion of a sunause in the proposed <br />ordinance. <br />Ron Marier stated he lives on the northeast corner of Peltie a . d asked that the City Council <br />consider not only the herons but also the underlying veg m do exists at the north end of the lake. <br />He indicated many experts have given their opinions . g the impact of disturbing the lake <br />bottom, as well as the sensitive plants. He indicate ea al of water runs through Peltier Lake <br />and the only buffer is the north end of the lake. � fe t eluding a sunset clause in the ordinance and <br />allowing motorboats to travel through the nort e lake again in the future would rip up the <br />plants and disturb the bottom of the lake and ; ately jeopardize the quality of the lake and its <br />sensitive ecosystem. <br />Mr. Marier asked the City Council to onsider the aquatic ecosystem and quality of Peltier <br />Lake and secondarily the heron room ry. b r' ed the majority of the residents on the northeast <br />side of the lake agree that protection s ecosystem and rookery come first over recreational <br />considerations. <br />Mayor Bergeson noted the Ci eceived a letter from eight residents on the northeast side of the lake <br />asking that the no -wake zone lin run straight across the lake and not be angled. He invited a <br />representative of that group to address this request. <br />Nancy Bowring, 7608 Peltier Lake Drive, stated last week a number of the Peltier Lake lakeshore <br />property owners met. She indicated that she had polled eight of the nine property owners on the <br />northeast side of the lake and, due to safety concerns of an angled no -wake zone, six of those eight <br />property owners agreed to support a no -wake zone 200 feet south of the island running straight across <br />the lake. Additionally, eight of the nine property owners supported a no -wake zone 200 feet south of <br />the lake angled to the northeast. She indicated all the property owners supported some sort of no - <br />wake zone since they all agree that the entire ecosystem of the lake deserves attention. <br />