My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
06/10/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
06/10/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 12:18:06 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 11:38:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
06/10/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 10 2002 <br />to waive the building permit fee as requested, they establish some sort of criteria in the building code <br />that authorizes such action. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if an emergency ordinance as suggested by Councilmember Carlson <br />would be appropriate. <br />City Attorney Hawkins believed an emergency ordinance would simply be a procedural method of <br />expediting the process and he was not certain this was an emergency situation. He indicated whether <br />the Council passed an emergency ordinance or a regular ordinance, there would still have to be a <br />variance procedure spelled out. <br />City Administrator Waite Smith noted these types of fees are a significant part of the City's revenues. <br />She noted when the City Council disregarded that situation previously and believed it would not set a <br />precedent because the circumstances would not occur again, th ty was deluged with similar <br />requests. She wished to point out that allowing fees to be waive a serious impact on the City's <br />budget. <br />City Attorney Hawkins felt if the City Council wished top e = s request, they must determine <br />under what circumstances they would be willing to allo _ e «' ng of building permit fees. He felt <br />this will be a complex issue in determining criteria. <br />Councilmember Carlson noted in setting its fees <br />charging. She expressed concern that if the Ci <br />the City may question whether they would th <br />Councilmember Reinert questioned wheal <br />request this evening. Mayor Bergeso <br />with the project. He questioned w <br />building permit, then refund the fee <br />must have a basis to justify the amounts it is <br />ne person to not pay their fees, others within <br />paying for those waived fees. <br />ould be necessary for the City Council to act on this <br />that the individual involved would like to move ahead <br />fion would be different to collect the fee, issue the <br />the ions Club. <br />It was City Attorney Hawkin • • ni • tha this would have the same affect as waiving the building <br />permit fee upfront. <br />Mayor Bergeson felt because the effects would be the same, there would be no urgency to take action <br />on this request since the City Council could discuss the potential for a refund at a later date. <br />Councilmember Reinert questioned City staff on how long they anticipated it would take to draft an <br />amendment to the City code with specific criteria to allow the waiving of building permit fees. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated there would be a first and second reading of such <br />a proposed ordinance, at which point the ordinance would be required to be published. Therefore, he <br />anticipated a time frame of approximately two months for such an ordinance to take affect. He <br />indicated the emergency ordinance procedure eliminates the readings and the publication <br />requirements, however, he questioned whether this request qualifies as an emergency. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.