Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES JUNE 24, 2002 <br />have the opportunity to opt out of special assessments. He stated, under Federal guidelines, because <br />those three areas are separate from the other areas of the City, they are treated differently and do not <br />qualify for tax-exempt financing. Therefore, the Apollo Drive/Lake Drive project had to be removed <br />from the tax-exempt financing. He indicated this resulted in a higher interest rate and an additional <br />cost to the City of approximately $132,000. <br />Mr. Shannon indicated the principal and interest on both bond issues would be paid through special <br />assessments against the benefited properties and the agreed upon interest rate for the assessments was <br />7%. He anticipated this spread would more than cover the principal and interest. <br />Mr. Shannon acknowledged the City's bond rating had been improved from A3 to A2. He stated this <br />was a very good rating situation for lower interest rates. He expressed his appreciation to City staff <br />for working with Moody to obtain this higher rating. He indicated this higher rating reflected the <br />City's growing economic base and noted the expectations of the 'ty due to this higher rating. <br />Mr. Shannon congratulated the City on its improved rating, whi ' - e ` was very attractive for the <br />bonds. He noted in the past a rate of 5.25% would have bee for tax-exempt bond issues. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell requested clarification that <br />1 and interest was anticipated to be <br />more than covered by the special assessments. Mr. S stated this was correct. <br />00 <br />Regarding the additional cost to the City of $132, uncilmember Carlson noted this tax-exempt <br />issue was related to a City Charter amendment ade in 1993. She asked Mr. Shannon if he <br />would recommend that the City re-examine t endment. <br />Mr. Shannon responded affirmatively. <br />to the City Charter and noted current <br />must be assessed to benefited prop <br />Councilmember Carlson su <br />needs at that time. However, <br />that were anticipated to grow. <br />reconsider this section of the Ci <br />assistance. <br />sed a number of concerns regarding that amendment <br />provision in the Charter that 100 percent of bonds <br />, if this is not the case, there must be a referendum. <br />ps the amendment to the City Charter had met the City's <br />ri <br />ate s the amendment did not address the three areas of the City <br />e felt the Charter Commission and the City Council may wish to <br />Charter. Mr. Shannon supported this action and offered his <br />Mayor Bergeson requested confirmation, if the City did not have a Home Rule Charter, under State <br />Statute this entire bond issue would have been tax-exempt. Mr. Shannon stated this was correct. He <br />noted, however, there are Federal guidelines that must be met and, if there are guarantees by a <br />developer on a project and the developer is receiving a direct benefit, this would be treated differently <br />and the issue would be taxable. <br />Mayor Bergeson congratulated City staff on obtaining a higher bond rating. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-60, Awarding the Sale of $645,000 <br />G.O. Improvement Bonds, Series 2002A. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. <br />4 <br />