Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 26, 2002 <br />neighborhood to the north and protect the character of the neighborhood. She stated there was <br />concern by residents of Holly Street that they would not have the opportunity to say "no" to that road <br />extension. They were told if there are two properties, they would have protection under the Charter to <br />vote. But if extended east and west, more than two property owners would be involved so they would <br />not have as much protection as the City presented they would have. She requested the motion be <br />amended to not require the extension of the Holly Street easement. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell stated his concern is with traffic control when the property to the south <br />develops. He asked about the impact to develop the property to the south if the street is not stubbed <br />in. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated it would have no direct impact but it is the <br />thought to have some unifying connectivity between developments. He noted that Lino Lakes is a <br />cluster of developments in and of themselves, and this project - ld be set back from Birch Street <br />with no connectivity to other developments. He stated that deve segregated city and in the <br />future, all development proposals will impact traffic on Birch S ere would be no other <br />alternative but to use Birch Street. <br />Community Development Director Grochala explained t <br />property to the south develops in the future; there wo <br />Street. He stated Holly Street would be a residenti <br />Community Development Director Grochala st, <br />connection but would function better with th <br />comments from the Fire and Police Dep <br />not stubbed out to provide that access. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated he would f <br />possibility to connect neighborhoods. <br />should have been connecte <br />ituation would occur when the <br />o other alternative but to use Birch <br />eet, t a collector street. <br />operty to the south can function without the <br />ection. He stated that on a staff level they look at <br />most times they ask why a street connection was <br />staff's intent is to keep the "door" open for options. <br />al for connection since it is important to have the <br />oted there are a lot of situations where neighborhoods <br />but now that is not possible. <br />Mayor Bergeson advised Coun member Carlson that she could continue to solicit comments or <br />pursue the amendment by placinan amendment motion on the floor. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he likes to look at what would be accomplished and a concern with the <br />stub would be more of an immediate concern. He questioned whether a street would be forced in <br />there as the concern was expressed during Open Mike. He stated he does not think the City would <br />force a road through there or utilize the stub for 20, 25, or 30 years in the future. He stated that <br />maybe no one will want to develop the land to the south of this development but he thinks it would be <br />irresponsible for the City to not allow the option for a stub connection which would allow the City to <br />grow in a manner that makes sense and allows emergency vehicle access. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he supports providing those types of options for the future. He stated <br />if he lived in this neighborhood or to the south he may not prefer having the stub but the Council <br />17 <br />