My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
08/26/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
08/26/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 2:36:03 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 1:31:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
08/26/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES ' AUGUST 26, 2002 <br />group submitting a petition. If they determine it meets the threshold of an EAW then it is forwarded <br />to the City Council to make that determination. He stated in staff's review of the information, they <br />would not recommend at this point to go forward with an EAW on this site. Should the EAW <br />petition come in after Council approval, the project would be moving forward but it is possible that <br />final plat could be delayed if it is decided there is a need for an EAW after this point. <br />Councilmember Carlson asked if the 17 conditions apply to the plat. Community Development <br />Director Grochala answered in the affirmative. <br />Mayor Bergeson asked about the order of consideration. Community Development Director Grochala <br />requested a recommendation from the City Attorney. <br />It was City Attorney Hawkins's recommendation that the first consideration be the MUSA allocation. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-77, <p ving the Allocation of 54.73 <br />Acres of MUSA to the Stoneybrook Development. Councilme . er seconded the motion. <br />Mayor Bergeson asked if it is clear the MUSA is available <br />Director Grochala stated staff has held discussion with th <br />the paperwork at this point. He explained a PCA pe <br />that also requires a sign -off by the Metropolitan Co <br />Councilmember Reinert asked if a condition is <br />Development Director Grochala stated if tha <br />permit is required to proceed. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 02-77 can be foun <br />ation. Community Development <br />litan Council and are reviewing <br />ld also be needed for this project and <br />assure the MUSA is allocated. Community • <br />uld occur, the PCA permit would be held up and that <br />ty Clerk's office. <br />Councilmember Reinert move ; ap ove IRST READING of Ordinance No. 07-02, Amending the <br />Zoning Ordinance by Rezonm_" ertain Real Estate from R, Rural to R -1X, Single Family Executive. <br />Councilmember Carlson second the motion. <br />Councilmember Reinert voted yea. Councilmember Dahl voted yea. Councilmember Carlson voted <br />yea. Councilmember O'Donnell voted yea. Mayor Bergeson voted yea. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-78, Approving Preliminary Plat for <br />Stoneybrook. Councilmember Dahl seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Carlson raised the issue of Street G and stated she would like Council consensus to <br />not extend Street G for a number of reasons: 1) all five cul-de-sacs are under 500 feet allowed by <br />ordinance; 2) connection between Birch and Holly is not shown as proposed in the Comprehensive <br />Plan Map of proposed roads; and, 3) the development has two accesses that will be put in and one <br />planned for the future. She stated this change would make Stoneybrook more compatible with the <br />16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.