My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
09/09/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
09/09/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2015 2:41:35 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 1:49:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
09/09/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 9, 2002 <br />City Clerk Blair recalled that, per the license applicant for the subject tenant, the business would <br />consist of two separate parts and the tobacco portion of the business would be more intense than for <br />other liquor stores. <br />The Applicant indicated he has not seen the proposed floor plan for the subject tenant, however, he <br />had assumed that this was a legal use that would conform to City standards. He noted a lease has not <br />yet been negotiated for this tenant, rather the proposed tenant has simply submitted a letter of intent to <br />locate within this shopping center. <br />Mr. Kirmis noted the PDO zoning of Shopping Center District regulates the uses. He felt the City <br />was bound to allow permitted uses to locate within a development. He added a PDO is an overlay <br />that establishes flexibility in certain criteria but does not address specific uses. <br />Mayor Bergeson indicated a developer does not have a given right to a PDO. He indicated a PDO is <br />an agreement between the City and a developer to make concessions for a better design, which he felt <br />was true in this situation. He noted the proposed building is better looking than the basic <br />requirements of the Shopping Center Zoning District. <br />Councilmember Dahl acknowledged that a liquor store may sell tobacco products and questioned <br />whether the letter of intent from the proposed tenant had indicated the percentage of the business that <br />would relate to tobacco product sales. <br />The Applicant indicated at this point this is only a prospective tenant and it was his understanding <br />that this business has not obtained the necessary licenses. He indicated the letter of intent was rather <br />vague and he assumed this business would simply be a liquor store that would sell some tobacco <br />products. <br />Mayor Bergeson hoped that the applicant has heard the concerns of the City Council regarding uses <br />that are compatible with a family-oriented shopping center. He noted the Council has heard from <br />City staff that the City does not have a great deal of legal leverage to limit the proposed uses. <br />Councilmember O'Donnell moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-111, Approving Preliminary Plat for <br />the JADT Addition, as submitted. Councilmember Carlson seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 02-111 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />Councilmember Dahl moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-112, Approving Site and Building Plans for <br />the JADT Addition, as submitted. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 02-112 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 02-113, Approving Conditional Use Permit <br />for an Accessory Drive Through, Lot 4, JADT Addition, as submitted. Councilmember Dahl <br />seconded the motion. <br />17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.