My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/14/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
10/14/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 2:15:28 PM
Creation date
2/5/2015 2:24:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 14, 2002 <br />City Planner Smyser stated the document is technically available to anyone who requests this and <br />wants to view it. They can buy copies or view copies in the City Hall library. A copy will be sent to <br />the interested community group. <br />Councilmember Dahl questioned whether the Council had to wait 30 days until after comments come <br />back from the agencies or whether the public can pick it up immediately after the meeting, for <br />example? <br />City Planner Smyser stated by law, it has to be made available to anyone when a request is made. <br />Therefore, it is available to everyone at the same time, once it is printed. <br />Councilmember Dahl clarified that there is no waiting period. Anyone can come up and get it this <br />week or next week. City Planner Smyser stated that was correct. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she also had a couple of comments. Shewas concerned about the mound <br />system, because she knew that it stated what would be typical for sewer and water. She was sure that <br />whoever checked this was very accurate, but somewhere she recalledeeing that they might have <br />additional seating sooner or later and she was wondering if that mound system is just to accommodate <br />the current capacity. She had wondered if the capacity was referencing initial capacity or ultimate <br />capacity. Mayor Bergeson stated this had been addressed m the earlier comments, and staff has <br />already advised that the EAW addressed the ultimate size of the building. <br />Councilmember Dahl questioned the figures, and Mayor Bergeson responded that whatever the largest <br />number is, was how size was calculated. Councilmember Dahl stated she brought this up because she <br />shared Councilmember Carlson's concern on this point. And she wished to point out that the preferred <br />the corrected copy contain the two points Councilmember Carlson had raised. City Planner Smyser <br />stated that this had been agreed upon and would-be done. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated that it was possible there would be more additions, following discussion by the <br />other Councilmembers. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she had no additional comments at this time. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated he had two comments. First, he inquired as to whether there was a page in the <br />document about noise monitoring and modeling. (Figure 6 in the appendix.) He did not need an <br />explanation of this now and he did not know if it had already been done, or if it was a model and <br />would be done. His point was that since Councilmember Carlson raised the issue of noise related to <br />the lake and the island, was it possible to put a noise point on the lake end of the property in terms of <br />monitoring or modeling? <br />City Planner Smyser responded that the noise monitoring that was indicated here was traffic noise, <br />since that was the significant noise generator in the area. <br />Mayor Bergeson responded that the question remained whether it were possible to calculate the traffic <br />noise on the back of the lot in addition to the front of the lot? <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.