Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES <br />OCTOBER 28, 2002 <br />Councilmember Reinert commented on traffic calming and asked if Second Avenue could have a <br />four-way stop. He also asked when that option could be considered to see if it would help with traffic <br />calming. Councilmember Reinert stated that location is by the church and he thinks cars would not <br />travel too fast since they know a stop sign would be there so it would result in traffic calming. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br />Resolution No. 02-154 can be found in the City Clerk's office. <br />Mayor Bergeson called for a brief recess at 9:48 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 10:00 p.m. <br />Public Hearing, 62"d Street Reconstruction Project, Consideration of Resolution No. 02-155, <br />Authorizing Preparation of Plans and Specifications, Jim Studenski — City Engineer Studenski <br />explained that due to the continued development and growth oltarea increasing the traffic on this <br />roadway and the deteriorating condition of 62nd Street between Ware Road and Red Maple Lane, the <br />Council ordered a feasibility study for the reconstruction of the street. This segment of roadway is <br />designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) street and serves a minor collector within the City's <br />Comprehensive Transportation Plan. In addition, some properties adjacent to and beyond 62nd Street <br />do not have access to sanitary sewer or water. <br />City Engineer Studenski stated the street reconstruct i -portion of the project will be funded mostly <br />through MSA. Sanitary sewer and watermain will be mostly funded through assessments. The City <br />has received a petition from the residents to exempt them from any road assessments and a petition to <br />install sanitary sewer and water with the street r%onstruction. <br />City Engineer Studenski stated currently the south side of 62nd Avenue is outside the MUSA so if it <br />goes forward, additional items would have. to be addressed through a Comprehensive Plan revision. <br />Scott Brink, TKDA, presented the projcc timetable as follows: <br />City Council receives Feasibility Deport <br />and Orders Public Hearing <br />Publish Public Hearing Notice in Official Newspaper <br />Neighborhood Meeting <br />City Council Holds Public Hearing <br />City Council Orders the Preparation of Street and Storm Plans and <br />Specifications, and Declares Intent to Bond <br />Eminent Domain Proceeding (if necessary) <br />60 -Day Comment Period Ends <br />City Council Reviews Sanitary and Watermain Projects <br />Engineer Submits Plans to City Council for Approval and <br />Receives Authorization to Advertise for Bids <br />Advertise in Official Newspaper (Quad Cities Press) <br />Advertise in Construction Bulletin <br />28 <br />September 23, 2002 <br />October 1, 2002 <br />October, 2002 <br />October 28, 2002 <br />October 28, 2002 <br />December, 2002 <br />December 27, 2002 <br />January 13, 2003 <br />January 27, 2003 <br />February 5, 2003 and <br />February 12, 2003 <br />January 31, 2003 and <br />