Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 28, 2002 <br />Open Bids <br />City Council Hold Assessment Hearing <br />City Council Receives Bids and Awards Contract <br />Contractor Begins Construction <br />Contractor Completes Construction <br />February 7, 2003 <br />March 4, 2003 <br />March 10, 2003 <br />April 14, 2003 <br />May 1, 2003 <br />August 15, 2003 <br />Mr. Brink presented a map depicting the project area. He explained that most of the street is not <br />served by sanitary sewer and water so it has fairly the same costs even though it is a bit shorter in <br />length. He stated another difference is there is significantly more right-of-way access that contributes <br />to the cost. He identified existing and proposed right-of-way lines and proposed areas where <br />additional right-of-way is needed to obtain a consistent 66 feet of width. <br />Mr. Brink presented the cross section diagram and stated they will, dp their best to center the roadway <br />within the right-of-way. He noted that a temporary trailway was cons cted along this roadway and <br />this project would construct a permanent 8.5 foot trailway. A width 046 feet is being proposed since <br />the posted speed limit is 45 mph and the State Aid requirements' are alittle higher. He stated there is <br />some flexibility in the street width. <br />Mr. Brink reviewed the project starting on the westerly edge noting the street is generally 23 feet in <br />width. A four foot separation between the road and path is being proposed. He noted the centerline is <br />about four feet south of the center line to get both the roadway and path centered in the right-of-way. <br />He stated another reason for doing that is a garage that is located close to the right-of-way line. Mr. <br />Brink stated these issues will be worked on with the individual property owners as the final design is <br />addressed. <br />Mr. Brink presented the sanitary sewer praject, noting the few connection points that are available. <br />He diagrammed the alignment and locations of extension to pick up the rest of the properties. <br />Mr. Brink presented the watermain projcct. noting the location of existing watermain and the gap <br />from Hollow Lane to West Shadow Lake Lane that does not have watermain. He stated that the <br />watermain would be extended into that area and easterly to pick up those properties. <br />Mr. Brink stated the storm sewer project needs to be extended and the area is fairly flat. He stated <br />they would also propose some stormwater detention areas which will have to be reviewed by the Rice <br />Creek Watershed District. He stated the total project cost is $2.3 million and offered to answer <br />questions. <br />Councilmember Carlson asked about the status of the petitions to not pay the road portion and sewer <br />and water installation. <br />City Engineer Studenski stated the petitions had a number of double signatures for husband and wife <br />and parcels that are owned by one resident. He stated the total is a two-thirds petition for the sanitary <br />sewer and two-thirds against the street and stormsewer based on the assessed parcels. <br />29 <br />