My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/30/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
10/30/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 1:55:52 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 9:09:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/30/2002
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 30, 2002 <br />Councilmember Reinert stated he would like to see a request if the application is denied <br />and the reason for that denial. The new process would save a lot of time. <br />Councilmember Carlson stated applications that are denied should go through the current <br />City process. The City should make it easy for applicants as opposed to being too <br />difficult. Everyone should know they have the right to go through the City process. <br />City Planner Smyser stated applicants will be aware of the fact they can appeal or go <br />through the current City process. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated applicants can be informed of their rights with a summary of the <br />process. Sometimes things are gray and staff should have the right to bring a request <br />through the City process if staff is not comfortable with the request. <br />City Planner Smyser stated the concern with that is residents fling that some have to <br />go through the City process and some do not. Staff will give an update on all <br />minor subdivision requests. <br />City Planner Smyser reviewed the Design Standards s <br />lots will not be allowed. He explained the definiti <br />the proper frontage. <br />ting the creation of flag <br />flag lot noting they do not allow <br />City Planner Smyser read the section regar s Management Issues and how <br />means of accessing will be determined. County determines all accesses on County <br />roads. He continued advised conservation su s vision developments are laid out and <br />certain types must be defined and have cert requirements. <br />Councilmember Carlson asked aiout rferes to greenways within the document. City <br />Planner Smyser advised greenwa have multiple definitions. Greenways are in the <br />document and fall into tal habitats section. <br />City Planner Smyser referred to the Streets and Alleys section noting the City does have <br />the flexibility to create alleys. A diagram to help clarify that section accompanies the <br />statement regarding easements. Staff believes this section will be rewritten in regards to <br />the rear lot lines. The Park Dedication Ordinance was changed last year so no changes <br />were made to that section. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she thought the park dedication fees were going to be <br />increased. City Planner Smyser stated the City has no plans to change those fees. <br />Councilmember Reinert suggested a incremental increase be included in the park <br />dedication fee ordinance. City Planner Smyser advised the park dedication fees can be <br />changed easily because a dollar amount is not listed in the ordinance. The dollar amount <br />is only listed in the fee schedule. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.