My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
10/30/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
10/30/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 1:55:52 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 9:09:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/30/2002
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SPECIAL COUNCIL WORK SESSION OCTOBER 30, 2002 <br />Mayor Bergeson stated he does not see it as a problem because the City has limits on <br />growth. <br />City Planner Smyser stated staff is not convinced the language is necessary. Read the <br />staff recommendation for the language is the Council feels it is necessary. The language <br />indicates a percentage of the homes must be completed before the next phase is started. <br />This language only applies to development over 40 lots. <br />Councilmember Dahl read a statement regarding the builders/developers responsibilities. <br />She stated they should have a metal box to store equipment so it is not all over the lots. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated building inspectors are requiring that somehow. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated chicken wire does not contain anything. A new requirement <br />should be considered. <br />City Planner Smyser reviewed the Final Plat requirements n <br />development agreement. Staff needs to change the lan <br />development agreement. The City should set it up that <br />preliminary plat approval but can't start work on roads: un <br />This would require two development agreements. <br />done at the same time to eliminate drainage iss <br />ng t e City will require a <br />ng grading and the <br />ing can begin after <br />er final plat approval. <br />Community Development Director Grocha <br />from the area as opposed to bringing it in <br />grading smaller areas. Also, the City <br />conditional use permit. <br />.sop is that all grading should be <br />It isso more cost beneficial. <br />is also more effective to use dirt <br />s possible to create more disturbances when <br />grading in certain situations with a <br />Councilmember Reinert asked wiy thCit ill not allow work on the infrastructure to <br />be started. Community Developt.i irector Grochala stated the City has more control <br />this way in regards to phasingfans and MUSA allocation. <br />City Planner Smyser advised staff will rewrite that section to include the two separate <br />development agreements. Hreferred to the Minor Subdivision section advising staff is <br />proposing minor subdivisions be handled administratively. A minor subdivision request <br />would not go through the Planning and Zoning Board or City Council. That will save <br />time and money for everyone involved. The negative is that Council will not be aware of <br />what is happening. <br />Mayor Bergeson suggested there be some type of reporting system about minor <br />subdivision requests. <br />City Planner Smyser advised applicants would have the right to ask for a variance and go <br />through the City process if the minor subdivision does not meet necessary requirements. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.