My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/25/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
11/25/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 9:41:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/25/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
APPROVED COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 25, 2002 <br />"Minor variations from the approved plans may be approved by the City's Development <br />Review Committee, under the direction of the Community Development Director. Substantial <br />departures from the approved plans will require an amendment to the Planned Development <br />Overlay (PDO)." <br />Councilmember Carlson asked what ordinances established the City's Development Review <br />Committee and who the members are. <br />Community Development Director Grochala explained that the Development Review Committee is <br />listed under the site plan review and comprised of him, the City Attorney, City Planner, Building <br />Officials, Public Services Director, Police Chief, Fire Chief, and Environmental Specialist. He stated <br />this same language was included in the Target PDO. He explained that this language is included with <br />PDOs since the plan allows flexibility and there are always question about if a change is made, such <br />as in the trees to be planted or turning radius, does it require an amendment of the ordinance or is it <br />consistent with the overall intent. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated if a building was to be relocated that dramatically <br />changed the site, it would require an amendment to the PDO and rezoning. <br />Councilmember Carlson noted that citizens have come forward about a condition of approval being <br />changed and asked what "minor variations" are. Community Development Director Grochala stated <br />it would be a minor change to the site details and any changes to the conditions of approval are not <br />changeable by staff short of coming back for Council action. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated Councilmember Reinert raised some questions she did not think of. She <br />asked when the Bruggeman Homes development will it happen. Community Development Director <br />Grochala stated they have been looking at the site since June so he estimates they will submit a plan <br />for rezoning and site plan for the commercial aspect as early as January of 2003. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if the City would have to pay the initial 50% of the cost if the signal is <br />put in but the process has not gotten to a point with Anoka County deciding whether they will or will <br />not join. Community Development Director Grochala explained that timing is the issue and short of <br />doing a Chapter 429 process, it would be preferable to get all the components together prior to <br />commencing. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if the City has to put up the other 50% initially if Anoka County does not <br />cooperate. Community Development Director Grochala stated the City would put money up until it is <br />known there are no other alternatives. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked who would be paying for the a left turn lane on Highway 49. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated it would be cost shared. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if the City would have to pay for it if Anoka County does not pay for it. <br />Community Development Director Grochala stated that is a potential. <br />23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.