My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/25/2002 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2002
>
11/25/2002 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/6/2015 1:55:05 PM
Creation date
2/6/2015 9:41:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/25/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />APPROVED COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 25, 2002 <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if this is "dead in the water" if Anoka County refuses to participate. <br />Mr. Goertz stated it is his understanding that it is their (the developer's) responsibility to do the turn <br />lanes. Or if the other developer is involved, then they would cost share. <br />Councilmember Reinert asked if the dollars toward the signal could be assessed back to the Miller <br />Farm project when that proceeds. He noted in that scenario, the road improvements and signal can <br />proceed, the development project proceed, and the cost be assessed back to the Miller Farm property <br />when it proceeds. <br />Mr. Goertz stated the worst-case scenario is that the Miller Farm project does not proceed in the next <br />two years but then it is likely that he (Goertz) would purchase the property and end up paying for that <br />share. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated that it appears the left turn lane would not be bonded for against the <br />City's MSA funds. Community Development Director Grochala stated that would not be done but <br />should everything else fall apart, the City has the option to do that. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if staff would put that in the developer's agreement, with the City <br />Attorney's approval, so the City does not pay for it and the development would fund that. <br />City Attorney Hawkins stated his opinion that the developer indicated he would fund the turn lanes <br />and temporary signal, which would be his contribution. To go beyond that, the Council would have <br />to determine a funding source. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated this Anoka County letter was not received until the past Friday so she has <br />a lot of questions. <br />Mayor Bergeson stated the public hearing has already been held but there are several residents in <br />attendance. He asked if they would like to make comment. <br />Bruce Pruitt, 6517 Hokah Drive, stated he has been involved since the beginning and at the public <br />meetings. He stated he has no objection to Rockey Goertz developing the land he has purchased, <br />however, he has questions about the way the land is developed. Mr. Pruitt stated a rezoning from <br />residential to commercial is being requested and things have progressed from low -impact 9:00 a.m. <br />to 5:00 p.m. businesses facing on Birch Street to grandiose high -impact businesses. He stated it was a <br />low impact project with public benefit but now it looks more like it is becoming a public nuisance <br />rather than a public benefit. He stated as the stakes get higher, there are more questions so he is <br />asking the Council to vote against the rezoning until all the "ducks are in a row" and plans solidified <br />on what will happen in this area and to assure that is the way it will go. He stated that then Mr. <br />Goertz can bring plans in for a beneficial development. <br />No one else from the audience requested to address this issue. <br />24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.