Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 13, 2003 <br />APPROVED <br />address, and Council provided no additional direction except to express displeasure about some of the <br />numbers. Mayor Bergeson stated the Council has been fooling around with this plan for six months, it <br />is required by the Charter, and cannot wait to get additional costs on repairs to the City Hall or what <br />the State will do. He stated this is a responsible plan and to quote 7% is misleading since it is a <br />combination of growth of the City and inflation. He noted the original plan that was presented, which <br />included both inflation and growth of City services and City staff proportional to the City really <br />resulted in numbers of 10% or 11%. Staff was asked to cut back and got to a number of 7% which he <br />thinks is realistic. Mayor Bergeson stated the Council needs to move ahead and when the City gets <br />answers to some of the questions, the Council may have to revise this plan. He stated he is pleased <br />with the work staff has done since they have followed the direction of the Council and the Council <br />must now "get off the dime," make a decision, and move ahead. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked when this will be reviewed in 2003. Finance Director Rolek stated that <br />review will begin concurrently with the 2004 budget preparation. Then the 2004-2008 financial plan <br />will be reviewed. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked if this plan sets the stage for next year's budget. Finance Director Rolek <br />stated this plan includes projections of what staff, at this point in time, feels will be needed to conduct <br />business and deliver services at the same levels as in the past. He explained that as with any budget, <br />staff always re-evaluates what the situation is, the economics, what has transpired at the State <br />Legislature, factors of growth, and those type of issues. He stated that staff may or may not come up <br />with the same numbers as in the Five -Year plan, but his projection would be that they will not -- since <br />there will be additional information then that may alter the budget proposal for 2004. Since that <br />information is not yet available, there is no way to prepare for it at this time. <br />Councilmember Dahl asked, hypothetically, if it would stay the same or go down drastically due to <br />what will be heard from the State or if it will more likely go up. Finance Director Rolek stated this <br />plan must maintain some flexibility and the numbers may go down. He stated he has known the <br />projections to remain the same at times in the past but, again, the information is not yet available to <br />make assumptions at this point. <br />Councilmember Dahl stated she likes the diversity of the Council and also the diversity in the answers <br />because through that diversity the Council finds a lot of things she would not have come up with on <br />her own. She stated the Council makes big decisions that affect the entire City and she takes that very <br />seriously, as do all Councilmembers. She stated that she listens to each Councilmember and if they <br />want to take more time on something, she never says anything since they are respectful of her <br />concerns and questions. Councilmember Dahl stated she respectfully disagrees with some of what <br />Mayor Bergeson said but each has their own opinion. <br />Councilmember Reinert stated the budget for next year will be whatever the Council wants it to be, <br />10% or 2%. This year it started at 11% and ended up a little over 4% because that is what the Council <br />wanted. He stated this plan only provides a guideline for staff to manage and he supports giving staff <br />that guideline and then during the budget discussions it can be discussed what needs to be changed. <br />Motion carried 3 yeas (O'Donnell, Reinert, and Bergeson) - 2 nays (Dahl and Carlson). <br />6 <br />