Laserfiche WebLink
COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 <br />APPROVED <br />144 Don Acres neighborhood. The proposed plat would subdivide four existing lots and result in 14 lots. <br />.45 City Planner Smyser summarized the Staff report and noted the location of a swimming pool that is <br />146 within the drainage easement and will have to be addressed prior to consideration of the final plat. He <br />147 advised that the Planning & Zoning Board recommends approval with conditions. <br />148 <br />149 Councilmember Carlson asked staff to explain the MUSA issue and how it could be banked. City <br />150 Planner Smyser explained he would suggest the City ask for 17 acres of MUSA reserve which would <br />151 be set aside for this area, 6.2 acres would go to the Hailey Manor plat, and the rest would become a <br />152 sub -bank for this area should it further develop in the future. <br />153 <br />154 Councilmember Dahl asked if both sewer and water would be extended. City Planner Smyser <br />155 answered in the affirmative. <br />156 <br />157 Councilmember Dahl asked how many houses will be constructed. City Planner Smyser stated that <br />158 ten houses would be constructed and not phased. <br />159 <br />160 Councilmember Dahl stated she remains concern with a piecemeal plan and would prefer to have the <br />161 entire area done. She reviewed the lots that could and could not be served with gravity lines. <br />162 Councilmember Dahl questioned the life expectancy of a grinder pump and when the rest of the <br />163 neighborhood could be served should their wells fail. <br />164 <br />165 City Planner Smyser stated a grinder pump is an individual pump at each house that is paid for and <br />166 installed by the individual homeowner and would pump waste water up to the sewer pipe in the street. <br />.67 <br />68 City Engineer Studenski stated the pumps need maintenance and the life expectancy is not an issue. <br />169 <br />170 City Planner Smyser presented the revised phasing plan, noting it will end up with three lots being <br />171 left over so the number is not over 147. With regard to Councilmember Dahl's question as to when <br />172 the rest of the neighborhood will be served, City Planner Smyser used a site plan to point out the <br />173 location from where a future extension will be made. <br />174 <br />175 Councilmember Reinert asked for an explanation of the Metropolitan Council's consideration of this <br />176 requested Plan amendment. City Planner Smyser stated this is actually the City's second request for a <br />177 Comprehensive Plan amendment with the first request involving Elm Street. He advised that the <br />178 Metropolitan Council did approve that first amendment request; however, he is unable to predict what <br />179 the Metropolitan Council's action will be in this case. <br />180 <br />181 Community Development Director Grochala stated that with this type of amendment, the <br />182 Metropolitan Council's concern is utilizing the infrastructure in place to its maximum. They <br />183 indicated that they would not look favorably on one acre lots or extending utilities to serve just one <br />184 acre lots. However, they would look favorably if it also included the ability to divide those one acre <br />185 lots. He noted this application proposes a resubdivision into urban -sized lots so he thinks the <br />186 Metropolitan Council will act favorably. <br />187 <br />188 Councilmember Carlson noted there is infrastructure and a prior commitment for future subdivision <br />189 but the Council is doing quite a few things that the Comprehensive Plan says differently. She <br />iii190 expressed concern regarding the land use change from Rural unsewered to Low Density sewered and <br />91 the request for additional MUSA instead of a trade. Councilmember Carlson noted that the <br />4 <br />