My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
11/03/2004 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2004
>
11/03/2004 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2015 2:24:32 PM
Creation date
2/10/2015 1:01:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/03/2004
Council Meeting Type
Work Session Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 3, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />1 year. VLAWMO and the cities will need to review various legislative requirements and <br />2 determine the best way to meet obligations mandated by State and Federal statutes in the <br />3 future. <br />4 <br />5 Mayor Bergeson asked Mr. McDowell to update the Council regarding VLAWMO's <br />6 discussions in relation to merging with another watershed organization. <br />7 <br />8 Councilmember Carlson stated she would also like to know how the other cities feel <br />9 about merging with another organization. She also suggested property owners that are <br />10 affected be informed about the possible merger. <br />11 <br />12 This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, November 8, 2004, 6:30 <br />13 p.m. <br />14 <br />15 GROWTH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT/CONSERVATION <br />16 DEVELOPMENT, JEFF SHOENBAUER, MICHAEL GROCHALA, JEFF <br />17 SMYSER <br />18 <br />19 Community Development Director Grochala advised the City Council approved the <br />20 Parks, Natural Open Space/Greenways and Trail System Plan in August. The top priority <br />21 of the plan is the creation and preservation of greenways. This echoes the direction in the <br />22 comprehensive plan to establish greenway corridors. The main way to achieve this is the <br />23 use of conservation development. Conservation development is a means to achieve <br />24 higher public values than would be the case under a conventional development approach. <br />25 Toward this end, staff is proposing revisions to the growth management policy. The <br />26 spirit of the revisions is to encourage the type of development that meets the highest goals <br />27 of the Comprehensive Plan and the recently completed parks and open space plan. <br />28 <br />29 Community Development Director Grochala referred to the proposed ordinance <br />30 amendment noting the two options: <br />31 <br />32 • Option 1 would exempt conservation development from the growth restrictions. <br />33 That is, a conservation development would be subject to neither the annual <br />34 MUSA allocation limit (36 acres per year) nor the units restriction (147 per year <br />35 or 1029 total for Stage 1). <br />36 <br />37 • Option 2 allows a conservation development to final plat lots/units two years in <br />38 advance of its approved phasing plan. That is, it would still have a phasing plan <br />39 but the number of lots/units in the phasing plans could be moved ahead by two <br />40 years. In effect, the first three years of units could be final planned in one year. <br />41 <br />42 Community Development Director Grochala advised the Planning & Zoning Board held a <br />43 public hearing on the policy amendments on October 13. The Environmental Board <br />44 considered them on October 27. The Boards considered both of the amendment options. <br />45 Both Boards recommended approval of Option 1, exempting conservation development <br />46 from annual limits to give the City Council more discretion in approving housing above <br />47 the stipulated growth limits. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.