Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 3, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />1 <br />2 Community Development Director Grochala stated staff is presenting the draft <br />3 amendments now to allow time for Council consideration and feedback. Staff anticipates <br />4 bringing the first reading to the Council at the November 22nd meeting. Staff also hopes <br />5 to have the Fox Den Acres project on the same agenda. <br />6 <br />7 Mr. Jeff Shoenbauer advised staff is not suggesting the City disregard the current City <br />8 ordinances regulating growth. "Conventional development" is defined as a development <br />9 proposal that meets the minimum requirements of the City's ordinances regulating <br />10 subdivision and platting, zoning, street standards, and other pertinent requirements. <br />11 "Conservation development" refers to a collaborative process in which certain stipulated <br />12 public values are sought in exchange for greater flexibility on general development <br />13 requirements and the growth limits defined under the policy. <br />14 <br />15 Mr. Shoenbauer reviewed a working example of greenways, trails and stewardship within <br />16 the plan as well as the Fox Den conventional proposal. The conservation plan includes <br />17 approximately 28 acres of open space that would be controlled and maintained. He <br />18 reviewed the goals achieved within the plan along with the proposed commitments to the <br />19 developer. He noted the most important commitment to the developer is approval to <br />20 deviate from the City's current Growth Management Plan. <br />21 <br />22 Mr. Shoenbauer stated the Fox Den acres project offers a good opportunity to implement <br />23 the new parks and open space plan through the use of a conservation development. The <br />24 project is going through a very collaborative process that includes City staff, the Rice <br />25 Creek Watershed District, and the developer. The design includes such things as filling <br />26 and moving lower quality wetlands in order to preserve and increase higher quality <br />27 wetlands and upland areas. The overall gain in public value will be positive. <br />28 <br />29 Mr. Shoenbauer recommended the City amend the Growth Management Policy to <br />30 accommodate conservation development. <br />31 <br />32 Community Development Director Grochala stated staff does have the two options for <br />33 amending the Growth Management Policy. All growth restrictions would still apply for <br />34 conventional development. The proposed amendments include eliminating the <br />35 discretionary 20% additional annual growth for conventional development. The <br />36 amendment would only exempt conservation development from the growth restrictions or <br />37 annual MUSA allocation limit. The City would still have controls such as the Stage 1 <br />38 and Stage 2 growth boundaries. These are areas within which growth is to occur. The <br />39 total MUSA reserve for Stage 1 would still apply and cannot be exceeded because that is <br />40 what the City received from the Metropolitan Council. The prohibition on premature <br />41 development would also still apply. The subdivision ordinance prohibits premature <br />42 development to ensure adequate infrastructure exists to support new residential <br />43 development. <br />44 <br />45 Mr. Shoenbauer advised a list of public values within the amendment have been added to <br />46 discuss with developers early in the process. City Boards and the City Council should <br />47 then review a preliminary concept plan and determine if the project meets the City's <br />