Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION NOVEMBER 17, 2004 <br />APPROVED <br />1 management. The report is not a final plan but the first step in the process. The next <br />2 steps include developing pavement management policies and a pavement management <br />3 plan. <br />4 <br />5 City Engineer Studenski reviewed the life cycles of standard streets as well as the current <br />6 costs to maintain the streets. He referred to a map of the pavement ratings for all <br />7 roadways within the City. <br />8 <br />9 City Engineer Studenski reviewed the roadway projections and recommendations in <br />10 relation to the pavement management report. The recommendation included that the City <br />11 institute a maintenance reconstruction program in accordance with CarteGraph Criteria <br />12 (Appendix D in the report) in order to reverse the declining overall condition of the City's <br />13 roadway system and to avoid the additional costs associated with reconstruction of streets <br />14 allowed to reach a "poor" condition. <br />15 <br />16 City Engineer Studenski advised the costs involved are approximately $39 million over a <br />17 ten-year period and that does include $330,000 for overlays and $1,176,000 for <br />18 reconstruction projects per year. It is recognized that the desire to maintain a high overall <br />19 condition must be balanced with the City's financial capabilities to fund the maintenance <br />20 and reconstruction program. <br />21 <br />22 Community Development Director Grochala advised the intent of the pavement <br />23 management report is to implement a program to start maintaining streets on a regular <br />24 basis to allow for better roadways and to save dollars in the long run. The program has to <br />25 take into account what is financially feasible for the City. <br />26 <br />27 Community Development Director Grochala added that staff needs to confer with <br />28 Springsted to determine the best way to proceed financially. All projects would then be <br />29 prioritized and tentatively scheduled when funding sources are identified. <br />30 <br />31 City Administrator Heitke stated staff believes $330,000 per year for overlays is feasible. <br />32 Staff will work with Springsted and bring back recommendations and options for the <br />33 Council to review. <br />34 <br />35 Councilmember Reinert stated he would also like a recommendation regarding acceptable <br />36 levels of road conditions as well as policies of other cities in regard to this issue. <br />37 <br />38 Council directed staff to move forward with Springsted on the financial aspects of a <br />39 pavement management plan. <br />40 <br />41 City Administrator Heitke distributed a copy of an e-mail from Mike Trehus, Lino Lakes <br />42 Charter Commission Chair. The e-mail indicated the Charter Commission would like to <br />43 be presented with the pavement management plan as well as the City's plan for <br />44 communicating road and referendum -related issues to residents. <br />45 <br />46 Council directed staff to share the Pavement Management Report with the Charter <br />47 Commission and advise them a communication plan would be developed after the <br />48 financial details have been determined. <br />