Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION AUGUST 17, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />1 <br />2 2. The member community agrees to support the 2006 Board -approved <br />3 budget of $344,000. <br />4 <br />5 Mr. McDowell advised he still feels the organization should merge with Ramsey / <br />6 Washington. <br />7 <br />8 Council directed staff to confer with the City Attorney regarding any ramifications of the <br />9 City Council passing a resolution of support for a merger with Ramsey / Washington. <br />10 <br />11 Resolution of support for VLAWMO to merge with Ramsey / Washington was added to <br />12 the regular Council agenda Monday, August 22, 2005, 6:30 p.m. <br />13 <br />14 LAKEVIEW DRIVE FEASIBILITY, JIM STUDENSKI <br />15 <br />16 City Engineer Studenski advised information on the submitted petition for the extension <br />17 of City utilities along Lakeview Drive was presented at the July 20, 2005 Council work <br />18 session. <br />19 <br />20 City Engineer Studenski stated the next step is to order the preparation of a report on <br />21 sanitary sewer and water service. The study will cover Lakeview Drive from Elm Street <br />22 to North Road. The study will address, on a preliminary basis, design, cost, assessment, <br />23 schedule and other issues as they relate to providing City utility service to this area. <br />24 Surveys and soil borings will be performed to assist in preparation of the report. The cost <br />25 of the Feasibility Study will not exceed $45,000. Funding of the study must be <br />26 determined. <br />27 <br />28 City Engineer Studenski indicated staff is requesting direction from the Council as to the <br />29 next step that staff should take in response to the utility extension. Items that must be <br />30 addressed by the City Council include: study funding, comprehensive plan, MUSA, street <br />31 reconstruction schedule, funding of trunk improvements and assessments of the street <br />32 portion of the project. <br />33 <br />34 Council directed staff to check on the possibility of a moratorium on ordering feasibility <br />35 studies until a policy can be adopted. Council also directed staff to respond to the <br />36 residents with a letter that includes approximate costs that also includes the road <br />37 reconstruction, to see if there is still support for the project. <br />38 <br />39 Council requested that staff come back to the Council with recommendations in relation <br />40 to adopting a feasibility study policy. Staff should also look into the possibility of <br />41 establishing criteria for the submittal of petitions for projects. <br />42 <br />43 2006 BUDGET, AL ROLEK <br />44 <br />