Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />COUNCIL WORK SESSION DECEMBER 7, 2005 <br />APPROVED <br />1 communities". Staff does not feel that there would be any significant "relationship and <br />2 effect" from either proposed action to Lino Lakes and therefore finds no compelling reason <br />3 to enter into the incorporation or annexation proceedings. <br />4 <br />5 City Administrator Heitke stated staff needs direction as to whether the City Council wishes <br />6 to have this issue placed on a future regular meeting agenda for action and the petition to be <br />7 stated in the resolution, or whether the Council does not intend to take a position. <br />8 <br />9 The Council indicated they would like to hear from the County regarding their reason for <br />10 approving the resolution from Columbus Township before a decision is made. <br />11 <br />12 FUNDING REQUESTS FOR 2006 BUDGET <br />13 <br />14 City Administrator Heitke stated as part of the presentation of the preliminary budget to the <br />15 Council, staff identified five funding requests from other agencies. The Council's direction <br />16 to staff was to not include any funding for these outside agencies in the 2006 budget. Since <br />17 the adoption of the preliminary budget, staff has informed various organizations of the <br />18 Council's inability to fund outside agency requests this year. Inquiries have been made as to <br />19 whether the Council would entertain presentations from organizations requesting funding. <br />20 <br />21 City Administrator Heitke advised staff has taken the position that placing budget requests <br />22 on the Council agenda would be inconsistent with the past action of the Council, however, <br />23 they would forward the requests to the Council. He advised that staff is forwarding the <br />24 requests of organizations for funding presentations. Should the Council choose to reconsider <br />25 these funding requests, staff is recommending that all of the agencies be informed of the <br />26 opportunity to present to the Council since most accepted the fact that the Council had made <br />27 its decision. <br />28 <br />29 The Council determined presentations for funding requests might be considered prior to the <br />30 next year's budget process. Staff will draft a letter to send to the organizations explaining <br />31 this year's budget constraints. <br />32 <br />33 CSAH 14 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING <br />34 <br />35 Community Development Director Grochala advised Anoka County has completed the <br />36 preliminary plans for the improvement of County State Aid Highway 14 (Main Street) from <br />37 I -35W to I -35E and is beginning the final design. <br />38 <br />39 Community Development Director Grochala referred to the concept plan pointing out the <br />40 ramps and noting the proposal does include a new access opposite the ramps. <br />41 <br />42 Community Development Director Grochala stated Anoka County is requesting City <br />43 approval of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). The purpose of the MOU is to reach <br />44 general agreement between the parties regarding the project parameters. He noted the City <br />45 of Centerville has approved the MOU. Construction is slated to being in 2007. <br />46 <br />47 This item will appear on the regular Council agenda Monday, December 12, 2005, 6:30 p.m. <br />48 <br />