My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
01/23/2006 Council Minutes
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
2006
>
01/23/2006 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2015 1:51:48 PM
Creation date
2/11/2015 1:03:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
01/23/2006
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 23, 2006 <br />APPROVED <br />90 PUBLIC SAFETY DEPARTMENT REPORT, DAVE PECCHIA <br />91 <br />92 A. Approval of request to renew contract with Otter Tail Animal Control Center <br />93 <br />94 Police Chief Pecchia summarized the Staff report, indicating Staff recommends approval. <br />95 <br />96 Councilmember O'Donnell moved to approve the annual renewal of the Otter Lake Animal Control <br />97 contract. Councilmember Reinert seconded the motion. <br />98 <br />99 Motion carried unanimously. <br />100 <br />101 PUBLIC SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT, RICK DEGARDNER <br />102 <br />103 There was none. <br />104 <br />105 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT REPORT, MICHAEL GROCHALA <br />106 <br />107 A. Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program, Jim Jacques (TKDA) <br />108 <br />109 City Engineer Studenski summarized the Staff report, and introduced Jim Jacques from TKDA. <br />110 <br />11 Mr. Jacques introduced himself, noting his firm did the City's Storm Water Pollution Prevention <br />Aoki <br />12 Program. He stated that as required under the Clean Water Act, this is the annual public meeting. He <br />113 reviewed the components of the SWPPP, the items started, and/or those completed in 2005. <br />114 <br />115 Councilmember O'Donnell indicated this is the second storm water agenda item already this year as <br />116 the result of Federal and State regulations, and he asked if Mr. Jacques foresees further regulations <br />117 and mandates that will be further imposed on storm water management. He questioned if the City <br />118 gets any funding to help deal with the mandates. <br />119 <br />120 Mr. Jacques stated he does, noting he would expect more regulations from both State and Federal <br />121 levels. He indicated that cities do not directly get money to help fund the mandates. <br />122 <br />123 Community Development Director Grochala indicated that the majority of the storm water <br />124 requirements are paid by development, with the remainder paid by general property taxes. <br />125 <br />126 Councilmember O'Donnell commented that some cities are looking at a utility fee for storm water <br />127 management. He stated that he knows no one wants to look at additional tax, but the City Council <br />128 needs to look at a way to pay for these mandates, and maybe basing it on usage is the best way to do <br />129 so. He indicated that he believes the feasibility study the City Council directed will be important. <br />130 <br />131 Councilmember Reinert expressed a point of clarity on the feasibility study, indicating that the utility <br />132 fee is not a new fee, and the cost is already being paid for by the general fund, which residents pay. <br />1133 He indicated that the utility fee would be looking at a more fair way of charging everyone, based on <br />134 usage, and there would not be additional dollars created by the fee. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.