Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />• <br />• <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION November 3, 2008 <br />APPROVED <br />78 Jeremy and Jamie Gudmundson, 992 Kelly Street, were present. Mr. Gudmundson <br />79 explained that there are two dogs at his home but his family has interest in providing <br />80 animal rescue through fostering. The fostering involves housing one additional dog at a <br />81 time that has been rescued from a kill shelter. They have lived in Lino Lakes for over a <br />82 year and probably wouldn't have moved here understanding the regulations. The city is <br />83 one of only two in the area that have acreage restrictions. He understands that a variance <br />84 wouldn't be wise and that is why they are recommending a change to the city's ordinance. <br />85 The council asked about the "temporary" nature of fostering a dog and heard that the <br />86 Gudmundson's would intend to take in one dog (over their permanent two) at a time and <br />87 house the dog until a permanent home is located. <br />88 A council member suggested that a fostering situation should be viewed differently than a <br />89 permanent accommodation for three dogs. When discussing the amount of time that a <br />90 dog would normally remain in a foster situation, it was explained that it varies but it <br />91 would usually be a few months to a year. <br />92 The Police Chief indicated that, if the council is considering a change to allow for <br />93 additional animals, he recommends that it be overall since enforcement of regulations that <br />94 include "foster dogs" would be difficult to enforce. <br />95 A member suggested that there appears to be four options: no change to the regulations; <br />96 special allowance for fostering; changing the number of dogs allowed, and; changing the <br />97 acreage requirement. <br />98 The council referred the matter to staff with direction to research the options of changing <br />99 the ordinance (not including allowing a variance) in a way that makes sense for the whole <br />100 community (not an individual situation). <br />101 8. Review of Citizen Awareness Plan - Charter Amendment Exit Poll - The <br />102 council discussed the value of proceeding with an exit poll after the election (that was <br />103 occurring the next day). <br />104 The council concurred to hold off on a poll in order to see the results of the election and <br />105 to have further discussion about the future and possible charter amendment questions. <br />106 Staff should communicate that to the consultant. <br />107 The meeting was briefly recessed <br />108 5. Five -Year Financial Plan - Finance Director Rolek reported. This is the first <br />109 time that staff has brought forward a plan that is unbalanced — the estimated <br />110 revenue/expenditures are not balanced. In 2010 and 2011, the city has a mandated limited <br />111 levy, and with the budget requests brought forward, there would be a deficit in those two <br />112 years. The plan was formulated using assumptions on growth, tax base, and state law <br />113 limits on raising taxes. With valuations dropping in 2010, flat in 2011 and a conservative <br />114 increase projected for following years, there is a gap. Mr. Rolek reviewed the plan <br />115 elements. <br />