Laserfiche WebLink
the district, much less would be generated. The Hartford Group is only asking for <br />approval of the senior housing with 50,000 square feet of commercial, which is not in the <br />TIF district. So at this point, there is no TIF to provide. They are being very selective <br />about townhome developers, and are hoping to come in this spring with a townhome <br />project and a condo site plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine stated that preliminary discussions for use of TIF will be pay-as-you-go for <br />the infrastructure costs. The TIF plan lists the types of uses for TIF, including site <br />acquisition, infrastructure, site improvements. <br /> <br />Mr. Milbauer questioned Hartford’s capability to move ahead without the market <br />feasibility study. Ms. Divine stated this is an important issue but they are committed to <br />the senior housing and are awaiting the market study on the commercial. They intend to <br />build Phase 1 this summer. The YMCA has also indicated it could be prepared to start <br />this year. Mr. Juni said the Y still has $2 ½ million to raise, but they have brought on <br />someone to concentrate on fundraising. Mr. Juni believes within a few months there will <br />be a clear picture whether the Y can raise the money. The redesign of the site has helped <br />the Y. The Y has not submitted plans for approvals, so they are at best months out before <br />construction. <br /> <br />Mr. Gorowsky stated the essence of the issue is the difference between the current zero <br />capacity and full capacity. Other cities are not giving the maximum. People want to be <br />aware and comfortable with what the city ultimately does and how that will affect the <br />economics of it. This group could provide some indication, and market information about <br />what surrounding communities are doing. Members also suggested that the press be <br />educated about TIF. Ms. Hansmann stated the budget is skewed to the maximum <br />buildout, which may not happen, and people don’t understand it. <br /> <br />Ms. Divine stated that districts in the city have averaged five years of increment. The <br />larger the project, the larger the subsidy, but the more taxes it generates. Mr. Milbauer <br />suggested an update to the council regarding the TIF Districts. Ms. Divine stated in 2003 <br />the city decertified three districts and the council received information regarding the <br />amount now on the tax rolls. Members questioned if the original capacity of those <br />districts could be shown so that the council could see that only a portion of the capacity <br />was used. Ms. Divine explained earlier districts were done differently. The district budget <br />was set at the amount of subsidy the first project received, then the district was modified <br />each time a project was added. In the last few districts, the budget has been set at the <br />estimate of full buildout of the district. Those could be used to demonstrate that the full <br />budget is not spent. <br /> <br />Mr. Gorowsky said an historical perspective, and some indication to the council in terms <br />of where we might go will be helpful. For example, if the capacity of past TIF districts <br />has been 100% of the potential buildout, but the city has awarded less, that would give <br />some comfort. Then to know what comparable cities do, such as Blaine and Forest Lake, <br />would give perspective. Perhaps EDAC should provide some input. Mr. Juni said he saw <br />confusion and misunderstanding on this issue. Ms. Divine stated there is no doubt TIF <br /> 2