Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />Panatonni Development Page 2 September 17, 2003 <br />City of Lino Lakes, Minnesota <br />General <br />1. It is proposed to extend a street section (cul-de-sac) from Lake Drive to service the proposed <br />development. Lake Drive is under the jurisdiction of Anoka County (CSAH 49), and the proposed <br />street connection must be approved by the County. The proposed cul-de-sac serving the site is <br />intended to be a public street. <br />2. The July 1, 2003 letter to Polaris Group from RCWD states that the wetland delineation has been <br />reviewed and accepted. Some additional ponding areas are proposed to be created as part of the <br />grading plan to provide for stormwater detention. The proposed grading plan will require approval of <br />the Rice Creek Watershed District to confirm requirements for stormwater treatment, stormwater <br />conveyance, appropriate compliance with the Wetland Conservation Act, and mitigation <br />requirements for flood plain filling. The Developer shall provide copies of the permit application and <br />Watershed correspondence. <br />3. A geotechnical evaluation previously provided reports that the underlying soils are generally sands <br />and silty sands with the water table varying in depth. In general, the evaluation states that the <br />underlying soils are suitable to support the proposed building and infrastructure. However, the <br />evaluation also states that siltier soils should be removed and replaced with drier granular material <br />and compacted accordingly. For pavement areas, the upper 3 feet must be compacted to 100 per cent <br />of standard proctor density. Utility installation will likely require dewatering and some placement of <br />crushed rock where the siltier soils may not provide sufficient bedding. It is recommended that a <br />geotechnical engineer be retained and consulted accordingly through the duration of construction. <br />4. Landscape Plans (L1, L2, and L1.1) were provided in a previous submittal. In the August 20 review <br />memorandum, it was stated that the plan needed to be adjusted to avoid any plantings over utilities, <br />especially sanitary sewer, water, and storm sewer. Revised landscaping plans must be submitted for <br />further review. <br />5. The Tree Inventory and Tree Preservation Plans provide number identifications for the many trees on <br />the site. Separate sheets for the tree sizes and types must be provided. <br />6. Retaining walls are shown at some locations on the site plan. The detail sheet should provide a <br />standard detail for the type of wall and construction. <br />7. The developer shall be responsible for obtaining an NPDES permit prior to construction (see <br />additional note under Grading and Drainage). <br />8. A right turn lane on CSAH 49 is proposed for the southbound approach to the site, and a pavement <br />section and length are provided. The length of this turn lane and taper may be shorter than the <br />standard required by Anoka County. The proposed shoulder/turn lane section and length must <br />therefore be approved by Anoka County, and copies of approval correspondence provided. <br />