2003-123 Council Resolution - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Search

COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 11, 2003 APPROVED 180 meaning 'but for this assistance, the project would not happen'. So they are not giving away money 181 they would otherwise have, they are making it possible for projects to happen to generate future 182 income for the city. 183 184 Motion carried 3:2. Councilmember Dahl and Carlson opposed. 185 186 Resolution No. 03-123 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 187 188 ii. Consideration of Resolution No. 03-124, Modifying TIF District No. 1-9 189 Eliminating Two Parcels 190 191 Economic Development Assistant Divine stated Resolution No. 03-124 is to approve the modification 192 of Tax Increment Financing District No. 1-9, eliminating two parcels from the district. 193 194 Councilmember Reinert moved to adopt Resolution No. 03-124, approving the modification of Tax 195 Increment Financing District No. 1-9 and eliminating two parcels from the district. Councilmember 196 Dahl seconded the motion. 197 198 Motion carried unanimously. 199 200 Resolution No. 03-124 can be found in the City Clerk's office. 201 202 B. Hailey Manor Residential Subdivision, Jeff Smyser 203 204 i. Consideration of Resolution No. 03-119, Amending the 2001 Comprehensive Plan 205 ii. Consider 1st Reading of Ordinance 16-03, Rezoning Property from R -Rural to R- 206 1, Single Family Residential 207 iii. Consideration of Resolution No. 03-120, Approving Preliminary Plat and 208 Variance for Lot Depth 209 210 City Planner Jeff Smyser summarized the Staff report, explaining the project and indicating Staff 211 recommends approval of each action. He noted a change on page seven of the Staff report, the first 212 condition of approval, which should say: 213 214 The City's approval of the comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, preliminary plat and 215 variance is contingent upon Metropolitan Council approval of the comprehensive plan 216 amendment. The final plat shall not be reviewed by the City Council prior to said 217 Metropolitan Council approval. 218 219 Councilmember O'Donnell asked if all of these comprehensive plan amendments would be needed for 220 this project in 2010 as they are today, except for the request to move the parcel into the Stage 1 221 Growth Area. City Planner Smyser indicated that was correct. 222 223 Councilmember Carlson stated the City received a petition from these property owners, but she does 224 not have a copy. She would like to know which property owners in addition to the four involved in 5