My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-098 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-098 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 1:59:52 PM
Creation date
8/24/2015 11:46:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
07/23/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Met Council states that the flood plain of George Watch Lake in the Regional Park should <br />be avoided instead of being filled. <br />City response: The EAW states that 90 cubic yards of floodplain fill is proposed on the <br />site. Review and approval by the Rice Creek Watershed District will be required. <br />Floodplain fill will require the creation of compensatory storage. The City will include the <br />RCWD permit as a condition of approval for the project. <br />• Met Council states that Council staff is concerned that the applicant has not determined the <br />effects of projected increased volume of stormwater discharge on the Rice Creek Regional <br />Park Reserve wetlands and George Watch Lake. Increased water levels in the park may <br />significantly alter shoreline plant ecology and habitat. Due to the potential for significant <br />alteration to plant communities in a regional park reserve, it is our opinion that an analysis of <br />water level changes in the park reserve due to increased runoff from the site must be <br />completed before an EIS determination can be made. <br />City response: The watershed that drains into the chain of lakes encompasses a very large <br />area, perhaps as much as 100 square miles. As noted in several comments above, increased <br />runoff volume from development is a watershed -wide issue. Impacts are not limited to this <br />project. It is unlikely that the volume of runoff from the site will impact the vast acreage of <br />lakes and wetland systems in the 2600 acre park reserve. Nor can the impacts of runoff from <br />this project be considered to be significant, given the immense area that makes up the <br />watershed that drains to the chain of lakes in the park reserve. <br />• Met Council is concerned about the potential for plugging of the two small diameter outlet <br />pipes of the large detention basin. <br />City response: The City shares this concern. The City is requiring redesign of the outlet <br />to include a larger diameter pipe. <br />Lino Lakes Environmental Board <br />• At its meeting June 27, 2001, the Board recommended an analysis of impacts on wetlands <br />and lakes from increased runoff volume and the increase of phosphorous runoff loads. <br />City response: As noted in several comments, the size of the project and the amount of <br />runoff from it is insignificant compared to the watershed that drains into the chain of lakes. Any <br />analysis of runoff impacts would need to address the larger watershed. This issue and the larger <br />watershed is beyond the jurisdiction of the City of Lino Lakes. The RCWD is the jurisdictional <br />unit with authority for watershed planning. The City has a surface water management plan that <br />must be consistent with the watershed management plan prepared by the Rice Creek Watershed <br />District. <br />Responses to Comments On Lino Lakes Marketplace EAW page 10 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.