My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-098 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-098 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 1:59:52 PM
Creation date
8/24/2015 11:46:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
07/23/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Met Council states that a site evaluation should be done by a professional ecologist for rare <br />�-- and endangered species. <br />City response: A natural resource inventory analysis of the site was conducted in 1998-99 <br />by a consultant hired by the City. The study revealed no rare or endangered species. In <br />addition, as described in the EAW, the Minnesota Dept. of Natural Resources Natural <br />Heritage Database includes no record of rare or endangered species on the site. <br />• Met Council states that there is some question of the rationale for proposing to fill a wetland <br />so that there is better visibility from the freeway frontage. The avoidance argument (page <br />15) is not very compelling as there seems to be significant ability to develop the site to the <br />west. <br />City response: The Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) is the Local Governmental <br />Unit under the Minnesota Wetlands Conservation Act. The project applicant has submitted a <br />sequencing analysis and mitigation plan to the RCWD. The City of Lino Lakes relies on the <br />RCWD for administration of the requirements of the Wetlands Conservation Act. The City <br />will require that RCWD approval is obtained as a condition of City approval of the project. <br />• Met Council states that any wetland mitigation (page 16) within the regional park would <br />have to be a part of the existing master plan or a master plan update that would require <br />approval by the Council. There should be at least an equal amount of public parkland <br />purchased to replace the areas being used for wetland mitigation for this private <br />development. Funding should also be provided for on going maintenance and monitoring of <br />the "created" wetlands. <br />City response: City staff discussed this comment with John VonDeLinde, Director of <br />Anoka County Parks and Recreation. Anoka Parks has anticipated the improvements to the <br />park proposed as part of the wetland mitigation plan for the Lino Lakes Marketplace project. <br />The wetland mitigation provides an opportunity to fulfill the Anoka Parks plans. <br />Implementation of the wetland creation projects is intended to further park master plan goals <br />in several ways. The wetlands to be created near the campgrounds will enhance biodiversity <br />and provide an opportunity for public interpretation on natural resources and wildlife related <br />to wetlands. There is currently no such opportunity at the campgrounds. <br />The wetlands on the golf course will add biodiversity and enhance the recreation goals of the <br />park. <br />Thus, the wetland mitigation plans are consistent with the park master plan goals. Anoka <br />Parks would not have expressed interest in the arrangement if it did not promote park goals. <br />Responses to Comments On Lino Lakes Marketplace EAW page 9 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.