My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-098 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-098 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/10/2015 1:59:52 PM
Creation date
8/24/2015 11:46:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
07/23/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• MPCA also notes that the discussion of avoidance alternatives is somewhat confusing, and <br />that "investment -backed expectations" and "visibility from I -35W" are not appropriate <br />criteria for a decision on an EAW. <br />City response: The City agrees that investment -backed expectations of the applicant and <br />visibility from the freeway are not issues to be considered in making a decision on the <br />adequacy of an EAW or on the need for an EIS. <br />• MPCA also recommends that the developer look for every chance possible to infiltrate storm <br />water, and states that the major threat to the adjacent wetland and lakes is the increased <br />volume of storm water from the project. <br />City response: The project applicant has attempted to incorporate infiltration basins into <br />the drainage design of the project. The Rice Creek Watershed District is the local surface <br />water planning authority. The RCWD standards includes using infiltration when possible. <br />The project will require a permit from RCWD. <br />Increased runoff volume from development is a watershed -wide issue. Impacts are not <br />limited to this project. Nor can the impacts of runoff from this project be considered to be <br />significant, given the immense area that makes up the watershed that drains to the chain of <br />lakes in the park reserve. The City does not consider the runoff from this project to be a <br />major threat. <br />The City has intended that the site be developed for extensive retail use and has planned and <br />zoned it for such uses for many years. The site is within a larger City Center planning area <br />intended for the development of a central business district, or "downtown." The project site <br />is the best location in the City for extensive retail development such as the proposed project. <br />The City recognizes that wetlands will be impacted on site, but does not consider this impact <br />to be a threat to the regional park reserve. It is unlikely that the volume of runoff from the <br />site will impact the vast acreage of lakes and wetland systems in the 2600 acre park reserve. <br />especially with the size of the watershed draining into the chain of lakes. Also, site runoff <br />will be collected and treated by stormwater ponding, runoff rates will not increase, and <br />infiltration basins are incorporated into site design. <br />The City also notes that the site is not actually "adjacent" to any lakes. The site is separated <br />from the regional park reserve by the I -35W right of way, which is 260 feet wide. George <br />Watch Lake, within the park reserve, is over 1000 feet from the freeway right of way, with <br />wetlands in between. <br />Responses to Comments On Lino Lakes Marketplace EAW page 4 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.