My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-120 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-120 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2015 10:33:28 AM
Creation date
11/25/2015 1:37:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
08/27/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
environmental amenities. Conservation development principles are not <br />employed. They should be. <br />• It does not seem to be good planning to have lots with driveways on the <br />collector streets (12th Ave. and Holly Dr.). Removing those lots would better <br />allow for conservation of open space and desirable attributes within the <br />development. <br />• The street appears to be longer than needed. Make it shorter. <br />• Include the standard recommendations as listed on the developer check list <br />from the EB. <br />Environmental Board member Trehus made a motion to deny approval of 12th <br />and Holly project until the Environmental Board has had an opportunity to <br />review an adequate tree inventory and vegetation management plan. <br />Motion 2nd by Connie Grundhofer <br />Motion approved/All in favor. <br />'Oland -adows West 3rd Addition <br />indings: <br />. Highland Meado s West 3`d addition is not a <br />2. The Highland Mea. •ws West 3`d Ad <br />significant tree loss. <br />3. The Oak Savanna on the <br />site should be preserved, <br />conservation developmen <br />4. The Environmental B <br />management. <br />Recommendatio <br />onservation Development. <br />on development proposal plans for a <br />d of the parcel should and many other trees on <br />his could be made possible through utilization of <br />pies and a P.D.O. <br />rd did no <br />ave adequate information on surface water <br />1. if this prosal moves forward essentially s it stands, this developer should <br />satisfy city that all steps possible have -en taken to preserve trees. To <br />acco ►.fish this with the existing plat, it seeme• ..ppropriate to reduce the scope <br />of t grading plan, which may dictate the buildi of structures without walkout <br />b.•ements. The developer has objected to this suggestion, but has not <br />demonstrated that satisfying the city's concems about the trees constitutes a <br />hardship. <br />%notion Py ivil 'rebus: <br />• Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.