My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2002-077 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2002
>
2002-077 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2015 4:00:37 PM
Creation date
12/1/2015 8:41:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
08/26/2002
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Street A is proposed as a large loop in the southern half of the development. While this <br />section has two access points they form the same intersection and create a situation <br />similar to a long cul-de-sac. Staff has evaluated other alignment options, however it <br />appears that these would cause additional wetland impacts. Staff has reviewed this issue <br />with the Public Safety Department and the Centennial Lakes Fire Department and <br />determined that there are no access concerns with the proposed layout. <br />Staff is also recommending that the applicant provide a street stub alignment to the south <br />of the development in the approximate location of Street G. This would allow for a <br />future connection with East Holly Drive. The 2001 Transportation Plan identifies East <br />Holly Drive as a future Minor Collector and proposes its future connection with Holly <br />Drive to the west and southerly to Ash Street (County J). While these projects are not <br />planned in the near term, it would be practical to reserve the option to connect this <br />subdivision to Holly Street in the future. It appears that an alignment option is available <br />that would minimize impacts to existing properties to the south. It is likely that the <br />connection would not be made until development takes place to the south. <br />Street Width. In response to comments received by Rice Creek Watershed District the <br />Developer is requesting a reduction in the City's standard street width to reduce <br />impervious surface. The City currently requires a thirty-two (32) foot street width. The <br />developer is requesting a twenty-nine (29) foot width. Section 302 of the City Code <br />states that the City Council may permit variations from the street construction standards. <br />Staff has evaluated the request and determined that the proposed twenty-nine foot width <br />would be sufficient to handle local traffic needs within the development. However, it <br />does appear that parking would need to be limited to a single side to insure emergency <br />vehicle access. Additionally, the reduction in street width coupled with a curvilinear <br />design of the subdivision's streets may reduce visibility of on -street pedestrian <br />movements. Sidewalks along Street A and Street B may be necessary to alleviate this <br />concern. <br />The Environmental Board recommended reducing the street width. The Planning & <br />Zoning board recommended that the street width be constructed to the city standard 32 <br />foot width. <br />Grading and Drainage. The City Engineer has completed review of the Grading and <br />Drainage Plan. His comments, dated July 3, 2002, are attached. A Rice Creek <br />Watershed District (RCWD) Land Development Permit is also required. <br />The City's Local Water Management Plan calls for the minimum floor elevation, <br />including basement to be 4 feet above the groundwater, 4 feet above the normal water <br />level, or 2 feet above the 100 year flood elevation, whichever is greatest. The plan <br />appears to satisfy these requirements based on the proposed normal and highwater levels. <br />The developer is currently monitoring existing groundwater elevations for verification. <br />Final adjustments will be made with the final grading plans. <br />Stoneybrook Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.