My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
2001-046 Council Resolution
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Resolutions
>
2001
>
2001-046 Council Resolution
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/16/2021 6:51:14 PM
Creation date
12/3/2015 8:11:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Resolutions
Meeting Date
03/26/2001
Council Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AGENDA ITEM 7 A <br /> STAFF ORIGINATOR: Jeff Smyser <br /> C. C. MEETING DATE: March 26, 2001 <br /> TOPIC: Resolution 01-46: Variance From Collector Street <br /> Setback <br /> Rick Boschee, 1205 Peregrine Circle <br /> Lot 8 Block 1 Peregrine Pass <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> Mr. Rick Boschee of Boschee Homes, Inc., has applied for a variance from a setback <br /> requirement for a lot in Peregrine Pass. Mr. Boschee is a builder who prepared a plan for <br /> a house on Lot 8. The plan does not fit within the setbacks, which is the reason for the <br /> variance application. <br /> This report is based on the certificate of survey by Metro Land Surveying & Engineering <br /> dated February 13, 2001. <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> Peregrine Pass is an unusual development in that the developer worked very closely with <br /> staff to incorporate many environmentally friendly design elements. These resulted in <br /> some unique aspects to the development. In many ways, the project is an experiment <br /> utilizing several conservation subdivision elements. The site is zoned PDO Planned <br /> Development Overlay, and the unique design elements are part of the approved plat. <br /> Standards in the zoning ordinance apply if not specifically altered by the approved plat. <br /> For example, the conditions of approval for the plat state that the minimum house <br /> footprint size is that of the R-IX zone. However, no mention is made of altering building <br /> setbacks, so the setbacks in the ordinance apply. Setbacks are identical in both the R-1 <br /> and R-1 X zones. <br /> Setbacks <br /> • Street <br /> local 30 <br /> collector or arterial 40 <br /> • Front Yard 30 <br /> • Rear <br /> principal 30 <br /> accessory 5 <br /> • Side <br /> principal 10 <br /> �- accessory 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.