Laserfiche WebLink
Boschee Variance <br /> page 2 <br /> Normally, the right of way is the same as the property line. In this case, there is a park <br /> trail strip along the side of Lot 8, on 121" Ave. The trail strip is owned by the City, so the <br /> property line is the edge of the trail corridor. The side yard setback is measured from <br /> that. This poses no conflict with the proposed house plan. <br /> The standard 40 ft. building setback from a collector street also applies because 121n <br /> Avenue is a collector street. The setback from the road, which applies to all buildings, is <br /> measured from the edge of the right of way. The trail strip is 15 ft., and the proposed <br /> garage is shown 13.5 ft. from that, for a total setback from the road of 28.5 ft. This <br /> encroaches into the required setback by 11.5 ft. (40-28.5 = 11.5). <br /> Lot 8 does include some unusual elements. The lot is rather narrow at its front line. As <br /> noted, the trail corridor exists along 121" Ave., which reduces the lot width from what it <br /> would be without the trail. There is a drainage and utility easement covering a large <br /> portion in the northeast corner of the lot. In addition, there is an extra 30 feet covered by <br /> a wetland conservation buffer easement which further reduces the buildable area of the <br /> lot. Moving the house toward the back of the lot would leave very little backyard. <br /> Mr. Boschee's letter states that the problem arises due to a larger setback on a corner lot. <br /> It would be more accurate to state that the street setback is greater than the side yard <br /> setback, which results in a de facto larger setback on a corner lot, though it is not listed as <br /> `�- a"corner-lot setback." <br /> During the review of the plat in 1999, City staff and the developer discussed the building <br /> pads for the lots. The building pad location on Lot 8 of the approved preliminary plat and <br /> associated grading plan meets the 40 ft. road setback. Nothing has changed between the <br /> time of plat approval and the house design. No additional requirements have been added, <br /> nor are there any hidden requirements. All easements are recorded with the property and <br /> show up on a survey. The house pad location is a standard element of plat approvals. <br /> The setback requirements have not changed in the past two years. <br /> Findings for Variance <br /> In considering all requests for variance and in taking subsequent action, the City shall <br /> make a finding of fact: <br /> 1. That the property in question cannot be put to a reasonable use if used under <br /> conditions allowed by the official controls. <br /> 2. That the plight of the landowners is due to physical circumstances unique to his <br /> property not created by the land owner. <br /> 3. That the hardship is not due to economic considerations alone and when a reasonable <br /> use for the property exists under the terms of the ordinance. <br />