My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-14-2015 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2015
>
12-14-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 9:24:40 AM
Creation date
1/5/2016 2:05:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/14/2015
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2. Possesses the financial, technical and legal qualifications to <br />provide cable service. <br />47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4)(B)-(C). <br />A local franchising authority must also allow an applicant's cable system a reasonable <br />period of time to become capable of providing cable service to all households in the franchise <br />area. 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(4)(A). Additionally, in awarding a franchise, a local franchising <br />authority must assure that access to cable service is not denied to any group of potential <br />residential cable subscribers because of the income of the residents of the local area in which <br />such group resides. 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(3). Stated differently, a local franchising authority <br />cannot allow a cable service provider to engage in economic redlining or "cherry -picking." <br />B. 621 Order — Competitive Cable Franchising <br />In 2007, the Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC" or the "Commission") <br />released a Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking addressing competitive <br />cable franchising. 6 It is sometimes referred to as the "621 Order" because it addresses the <br />implementation of Section 621(a)(1) of the Federal Cable Act.7 Section 621(a)(1), among other <br />things, prohibits franchising authorities from unreasonably refusing to award competitive cable <br />franchises. <br />C. 621 Order — Applicability to State Laws <br />By its terms, the 621 Order applies only to new entrants.8 According to the FCC, the 621 <br />Order does "not preempt state law or state level franchising decisions ..."9 Rather, the FCC <br />"expressly limit[ed] ... [its] findings and regulations in this Order to actions or inactions at the <br />local level where a state has not specifically circumscribed the LFA's authority."10 In this <br />regard, local laws, regulations, practices and agreements are preempted to the extent that they <br />conflict with the FCC's rules or guidance adopted in the 621 Order and are not "specifically <br />authorized by state law."11 The FCC recently clarified the 621 Order in Implementation of <br />Section 621(a)(1) of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984 as amended by the Cable <br />Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992, Order on Reconsideration (Rel. <br />Jan. 21, 2015) ("We clarify that those rulings were intended to apply only to the local franchising <br />process, and not to franchising laws or decisions at the state level").12 <br />6 See FN 3. <br />7 Section 621(a)(1) is codified at 47 U.S.C. § 541(a)(1). <br />8 See, e.g., 621 Order at ¶¶ 18 and 139. <br />9 Id. ¶ 126. <br />10 Id. at ¶ 1, n. 2. <br />11 621 Order at ¶ 126. <br />12 See Exhibit 8, at ¶ 7. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.