My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Search
12-14-2015 Council Packet
LinoLakes
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1982-2020
>
2015
>
12-14-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/13/2016 9:24:40 AM
Creation date
1/5/2016 2:05:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Council Document Type
Council Packet
Meeting Date
12/14/2015
Council Meeting Type
Regular
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
244
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
overbuild competition. In those situations, average monthly cable rates were 20.6 percent lower <br />than the average for markets deemed noncompetitive. Id. <br />E. FCC 621 Order - Federal Preemption of Unreasonable Build -Out Mandates <br />In the 621 Order, the FCC declared "it is unlawful for LFAs to refuse to grant a <br />competitive franchise on the basis of unreasonable build -out mandates."13 The 621 Order does <br />not expressly prohibit full municipal build -out requirements, if they are reasonable (which will <br />depend on local circumstances). Although the FCC did not definitively define what constitutes <br />an "unreasonable build -out" mandate, it did list examples of both reasonable and unreasonable <br />build -out requirements. <br />a. Examples of Unreasonable Build -Out Requirements. <br />The FCC's examples of unreasonable build -out mandates include: <br />requiring a new entrant to serve everyone in a franchise area before <br />it has begun to serve anyone; <br />requiring facilities -based entrants, such as incumbent LECs, to <br />build out beyond the footprint of their existing facilities before <br />they have even begun to provide cable service; <br />requiring more of a new entrant than an incumbent cable operator <br />by, for instance, requiring the new entrant to build out its facilities <br />in a shorter period of time than that afforded to the incumbent; <br />requiring the new entrant to build out and provide service to areas <br />of lower density than those that the incumbent cable operator is <br />required to build out to and serve; <br />requiring a new entrant to build out to and service buildings or <br />developments to which the entrant cannot obtain access on <br />reasonable terms or which cannot be reached using standard <br />technologies; and <br />requiring a new entrant to build out to and provide service to areas <br />where it cannot obtain reasonable access to and use of public <br />rights-of-way.14 <br />b. Examples of Reasonable Build -Out Requirements. <br />The FCC notes that it would seem reasonable for a local franchising authority to consider <br />benchmarks requiring the new entrant to increase its build -out after a reasonable time, taking into <br />account the new entrant's market success.15 The FCC also opined that it would seem reasonable <br />to establish build -out requirements based on a new entrant's market penetration.16 <br />13 621 Order at ¶ 89. <br />14 Id. at ¶¶ 89-90. <br />15 Id. at ¶ 89. <br />16 Id. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.