Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL <br />AGENDA ITEM 6D <br />STAFF ORIGINATOR: Michael Grochala <br />MEETING DATE: September 14, 2015 <br />TOPIC: Consider Resolution No. 15-94 Adopting AUAR Update <br />for I -35E Corridor <br />VOTE REQUIRED: 3/5 <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Staff is requesting City Council action to adopt the AUAR update for the I -35E Corridor. <br />BACKGROUND <br />The I -35E Corridor Alternative Urban Areawide Review (AUAR) is an environmental review <br />document that analyzed potential impacts of development within a study area of 4660 acres. <br />The City of Lino Lakes prepared the AUAR in accordance with MN Rules 4410. The final <br />document was adopted by the Lino Lakes City Council on October 24, 2005. The AUAR <br />serves as a substitute environmental review. As long as a development project is consistent <br />with the assumptions of the analyses in the AUAR, no additional environmental review is <br />required. In order to remain valid as a substitute form of environmental review, the AUAR <br />must be revised under certain criteria. One of the criteria is the passing of five years. <br />The AUAR was last updated in October of 2010. Since that time the City's 2030 <br />Comprehensive Plan was adopted. Transportation improvements including the reconstruction <br />of the 35E/CSAH 14 Interchange, and extensions of both Otter Lake Road and 21st Avenue to <br />the north of Main Street have been completed. New development has also begun to take place <br />within the corridor including McDonald's, Northern Wholesale expansion, the Metro Transit <br />Park and Ride and the NorthPointe residential development. <br />The update was authorized by the City Council in November of 2014. A draft copy of the <br />document was distributed for agency review on July 1, 2015. The comment period closed on <br />July 17, 2015. The City received comments from the following agencies: <br />• Anoka County <br />• City of Hugo <br />• Metropolitan Council <br />• Mn/DNR <br />• Mn/DOT <br />A summary of their comments and the City's response is included in the attached response <br />matrix. The comments received did not require any substantial changes to the plan. <br />