My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05-05-2009
>
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 5:12:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2021 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charlotte, North Carolina, offers an interesting case study. The financial crisis left one of the <br />city's two big banks, Wachovia, ailing; this fall, Wachovia was acquired by San Francisco — <br />based Wells Fargo, in a deal that will cost the city many thousands of jobs. But things could <br />have been much worse; the deal also preserved manyjobs. What's more, at roughly the same <br />time, Bank of America, Charlotte's other large bank (and the biggest bank in the U.S.) bought <br />Merrill Lynch for pennies on the dollar. <br />A business truism holds that when your competitors are retrenching, it's a great time to grow <br />your market share. Deborah Strumsky, an economist at the University of North Carolina at <br />Charlotte, told me she believes that in the end, both Charlotte's banking industry and <br />Charlotte itself will emerge from the crisis all the stronger: "The Wells Fargo deal has saved <br />thousands of jobs by keeping Wachovia afloat. More importantly, Bank of America has taken <br />to the banking crisis like a shopaholic with a new credit card; it has been bargain -hunting <br />and cutting some astonishing deals. Bank of America will come out the other side far better <br />than in any fantasy it might have entertained previously." <br />In recent years, Charlotte's leaders have made some smart decisions about how to attract <br />businesses and professionals, enabling the city to grow into the nation's second-largest <br />traditional banking center; in the lottery of business failure and consolidation, it was well <br />positioned to win. But it was also Iucky, and last fall, it escaped losing, big-time, by no more <br />than a hair's breadth. Overall, the roster of places that benefit from the failure of their <br />champions' rivals will probably be pretty short, and the names on the roster somewhat <br />unpredictable. Especially among cities built around declining industries, more places will be <br />weakened than strengthened; as with all lotteries, most players will lose. <br />Crrlus LN THE SAND: THE END of EksF EXPANsioN <br />For a generation or more, no swath of the United States has grown more madly than the Sun <br />Belt. Of course, the area we call the "Sun Belt" is vast, and the term is something of a catch- <br />all: the cities and metropolitan areas within it have grown for disparate reasons. Los Angeles <br />is a mecca for media and entertainment; San dose and Austin developed significant, <br />innovative high-tech industries; Houston became a hub for energy production; Nashville <br />developed a unique niche in low-cost music recording and production; Charlotte emerged as <br />a center for cost-effective banking and low -end finance. <br />But in the heady days of the housing bubble, some Sun Belt cities —Phoenix and Las Vegas <br />are the best examples —developed economies centered largely on real estate and <br />construction. With sunny weather and plenty of flat, empty land, they got caught in a classic <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.