My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05-05-2009
>
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 5:12:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2021 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Will people wash out of these places as fast as they washed in, leaving empty sprawl and all <br />the ills that accompany it? Will these cities gradually attract more businesses and industries, <br />allowing them to build more -diverse and more -resilient economies? Or will they subsist on <br />tourism —which may be meager for quite some time —and on the Social Security checks of <br />their retirees? No matter what, their character and atmosphere are likely to change radically. <br />1'iIE lAmr s of .SUBURBAN GROWTH <br />Every phase or epoch of capitalism has its own distinct geography, or what economic <br />geographers tali the "spatial fix" for the era. The physical character of the economy —the way <br />land is used, the location of homes and businesses, the physical infrastructure that ties <br />everything together —shapes consumption, production, and innovation. As the economy <br />grows and evolves, so too must the landscape. <br />To a surprising degree, the causes of this crash are geographic in nature, and they point out a <br />whole system of economic organization and growth that has reached its limit. Positioning the <br />economy to grow strongly in the coming decades will require not just fiscal stimulus or <br />industrial reform; it will require a new kind of geography as well, a new spatial fix for the <br />next chapter of American economic history-. <br />Suburbanization was the spatial fix for the industrial age —the geographic expression of mass <br />production and the early credit economy. Henry Ford's automobiles had been rolling off <br />assembly lines since 1913, but "Fordism," the combination of mass production and mass <br />consumption to create national prosperity, didn't emerge as a full-blown economic and social <br />model until the r93os and the advent of Roosevelt's New Deal programs. <br />Before the Great Depression, only a minority of Americans owned a home. But in the 1930s <br />and'40s, government policies brought about Ionger-term mortgages, which lowered <br />payments and enabled more people to buy a house. Fannie Mae was created to purchase <br />those mortgages and lubricate the system. And of course the tax deduction on mortgage - <br />interest payments (which had existed since 1913, when the federal income-tax system was <br />created) privileged house purchases over other types of spending. Between 1940 and r96o, <br />the homeownership rate rose from a4 percent to 62 percent. <br />Demand for houses was symbiotic with demand for cars, and both were helped along by <br />federal highway construction, among other infrastructure projects that subsidized a new <br />suburban lifestyle and in turn fueled demand for all manner of household goods. More <br />recently, innovations in finance like adjustable -rate mortgages and securitized subprime <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.