My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2000's
>
2009
>
05-05-2009
>
May 5, 2009 City Council packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/22/2025 5:12:46 PM
Creation date
1/14/2021 4:11:49 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
loans expanded homeownership further and kept demand high. By 2004, a record 69.2 <br />percent of American families owned their home. <br />For the generation that grew up during the Depression and was inclined to pinch pennies, <br />policies that encouraged freer spending were sensible enough —they allowed the economy to <br />grow faster_ But as younger generations, weaned on credit, followed, and credit availability <br />increased, the system got out of hand. Housing, meanwhile, became an ever -more -central <br />part of the American Dream: for many people, as the recent housing bubble grew, owning a <br />home came to represent not just an end in itself, but a means to financial independence. <br />On one level, the crisis has demonstrated what everyone has known for a long time: <br />Americans have been living beyond their means, using illusory housing wealth and huge <br />slugs of foreign capital to consume far more than we've produced. The crash surely signals <br />the end to that; the adjustment, while painful, is necessary. <br />But another crucial aspect of the crisis has been largely overlooked, and it Wright ultimately <br />prove more important. Because America's tendency to overconsume and under -save has <br />been intimately intertwined with our postwar spatial fix —that is, with housing and <br />suburbanization—the shape of the economy has been badly distorted, from where people live, <br />to where investment flows, to what's produced. Unless we make fundamental policy changes <br />to eliminate these distortions, the economy is likely to face worsening handicaps in the years <br />ahead. <br />Suburbanization—and the sprawling growth it propelled —made sense for a time. The cities of <br />the early and mid -loth century were dirty, sooty, smelly, and crowded, and commuting from <br />the first, close -in suburbs was fast and easy. And as manufacturing became more <br />technologically stable and product lines matured during the postwar boom, suburban growth <br />dovetailed nicely with the pattern of industrial growth. Businesses began opening new plants <br />in green -field locations that featured cheaper land and labor; management saw no reason to <br />continue making now -standardized products in the expensive urban locations where they'd <br />first been developed and sold. Work was outsourced to then -new suburbs and the emerging <br />areas of the Sun Belt, whose connections to bigger cities by the highway system afforded <br />rapid, low-cost distribution. This process brought the Sun Belt economies (which had lagged <br />since the Civil War) into modern times, and sustained a long boom for the United States as a <br />whole. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.